Zhong Da-ke, Tang Dan, Xue Li, Wen Jin, Li You-ping
Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Teaching and Research Office of Pediatrics, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Chin J Integr Med. 2016 Feb;22(2):130-40. doi: 10.1007/s11655-014-1849-8. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
To review and assess the effect of single moxibustion for exercise-induced fatigue: (EIF).
Computer-search for 8 medical databases and 5 clinical trail registries were conducted for: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), added with hand-search for 10 Chinese acupuncture-moxibustion journals and additional references. Data from included RCTs were pooled by RevMan5.1. Methodology quality of RCTs was judged by Cochrane Collaboration assessment tool while quality of primary outcomes was evaluated by GRADE3.2.
Five RCTs were finally included, all reported in small sample size with high risk of: bias. Comparisons on single moxibustion and rest relief (without treatment) were studied. Six outcomes were reported, all favored moxibustion to rest relief for EIF. Primary outcomes showed as rating of perceived exertion (RPE) with mean difference (MD)=-0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.80, -0.19], 800-m race performance with MD=-2.21, 95% CI [-3.57, -0.85], and Harvard Step Index (HSI) with MD=14.75, 95% CI [8.35, 21.15]. Moreover, all primary outcomes as RPE, 800-m race performance and HSI were rated low quality.
Single moxibustion might be considered effective for EIF. However, due to small samples of included RCTs, high risk of bias among studies and poor quality of primary outcomes and subjects restricted to Chinese athletes only, these results present limitation, and should be taken with caution for practice. More large-size studies with rigorous design are warranted to further test effectiveness of moxibustion for EIF.
回顾和评估单艾灸对运动性疲劳(EIF)的影响。
通过计算机检索8个医学数据库和5个临床试验注册库,查找随机对照试验(RCT),并手工检索10种中国针灸杂志及其他参考文献。纳入的RCT数据采用RevMan5.1进行汇总。RCT的方法学质量采用Cochrane协作评估工具判断,主要结局的质量采用GRADE3.2进行评估。
最终纳入5项RCT,均为小样本报告,存在高偏倚风险。对单艾灸与休息缓解(未治疗)进行了比较。报告了6项结局,所有结果均显示艾灸对运动性疲劳的缓解优于休息。主要结局显示,自觉用力程度(RPE)的平均差(MD)=-0.49,95%置信区间(CI)[-0.80,-0.19];800米赛跑成绩的MD=-2.21,95%CI[-3.57,-0.85];哈佛台阶指数(HSI)的MD=14.75,95%CI[8.35,21.15]。此外,所有主要结局如RPE、800米赛跑成绩和HSI的质量等级均较低。
单艾灸可能对运动性疲劳有效。然而,由于纳入的RCT样本量小、研究间存在高偏倚风险、主要结局质量差且受试者仅局限于中国运动员,这些结果存在局限性,在实践中应谨慎对待。需要更多设计严谨的大样本研究来进一步验证艾灸对运动性疲劳的有效性。