Jeng Wei-De, Ouyang Yuan, Huang Ting-Wei, Duann Jeng-Ren, Chiou Jin-Chern, Tang Yu-Shun, Ou-Yang Mang
Appl Opt. 2014 Oct 10;53(29):H76-84. doi: 10.1364/AO.53.000H76.
Different levels of visual fatigue in the human eye depend on different color-formation methods and image quality. This paper uses the high-frequency component of the spectral power of accommodative microfluctuations as a major objective indicator for analyzing the effects of visual fatigue based on various displays, such as color-formation displays and 3D displays. Also, a questionnaire is used as a subjective indicator. The results are that 3D videos cause greater visual fatigue than 2D videos (p<0.001), the shutter-type 3D display causes visual fatigue more than the polarized type (p=0.012), the display of the time-sharing method causes greater visual fatigue than the spatial-formation method (p=0.008), and there is no significance between various light source modules of displays (p=0.162). In general, people with normal color discrimination have more visual fatigue than those with good color discrimination (p<0.001). Therefore, this paper uses the high-frequency component of accommodative microfluctuations to evaluate the physiological stress or strain by overexerting the visual system, and can compare the level of visual fatigue between various displays.
人眼不同程度的视觉疲劳取决于不同的色彩形成方式和图像质量。本文以调节性微波动光谱功率的高频分量作为主要客观指标,基于彩色形成显示器和3D显示器等各种显示器来分析视觉疲劳的影响。此外,使用问卷调查作为主观指标。结果表明,3D视频比2D视频导致更大的视觉疲劳(p<0.001),快门式3D显示器比偏光式导致更多的视觉疲劳(p=0.012),分时法显示器比空间形成法导致更大的视觉疲劳(p=0.008),显示器的各种光源模块之间无显著差异(p=0.162)。一般来说,色觉正常的人比色觉良好的人有更多的视觉疲劳(p<0.001)。因此,本文利用调节性微波动的高频分量来评估视觉系统过度劳累所产生的生理压力或应变,并可比较各种显示器之间的视觉疲劳程度。