Wada Kunio, Yoshida Toshinori, Takahashi Naofumi, Matsumoto Kyomu
Toxicology Division, The Institute of Environmental Toxicology, 4321, Uchimoriya-machi, Joso-shi, Ibaraki 303-0043, Japan.
Toxicology Division, The Institute of Environmental Toxicology, 4321, Uchimoriya-machi, Joso-shi, Ibaraki 303-0043, Japan.
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2014 Jul 15;769:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 10.
The in vivo comet assay has been used for the evaluation of DNA damage and repair in various tissues of rodents. However, it can give false-positive results due to non-specific DNA damage associated with cell death. In this study, we examined whether the in vivo comet assay can distinguish between genotoxic and non-genotoxic DNA damage in urinary bladder cells, by using the following seven chemicals related to urinary bladder carcinogenesis in rodents: N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (BBN), glycidol, 2,2-bis(bromomethyl)-1,3-propanediol (BMP), 2-nitroanisole (2-NA), benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC), uracil, and melamine. BBN, glycidol, BMP, and 2-NA are known to be Ames test-positive and they are expected to produce DNA damage in the absence of cytotoxicity. BITC, uracil, and melamine are Ames test-negative with metabolic activation but have the potential to induce non-specific DNA damage due to cytotoxicity. The test chemicals were administered orally to male Sprague-Dawley rats (five per group) for each of two consecutive days. Urinary bladders were sampled 3h after the second administration and urothelial cells were analyzed by the comet assay and subjected to histopathological examination to evaluate cytotoxicity. In the urinary bladders of rats treated with BBN, glycidol, and BMP, DNA damage was detected. In contrast, 2-NA induced neither DNA damage nor cytotoxicity. The non-genotoxic chemicals (BITC, uracil, and melamine) did not induce DNA damage in the urinary bladders under conditions where some histopathological changes were observed. The results indicate that the comet assay could distinguish between genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals and that no false-positive responses were obtained.
体内彗星试验已用于评估啮齿动物各种组织中的DNA损伤和修复情况。然而,由于与细胞死亡相关的非特异性DNA损伤,该试验可能会给出假阳性结果。在本研究中,我们通过使用以下七种与啮齿动物膀胱癌发生相关的化学物质,来检测体内彗星试验能否区分膀胱细胞中的遗传毒性和非遗传毒性DNA损伤:N-丁基-N-(4-羟丁基)亚硝胺(BBN)、缩水甘油、2,2-双(溴甲基)-1,3-丙二醇(BMP)、2-硝基苯甲醚(2-NA)、苄基异硫氰酸酯(BITC)、尿嘧啶和三聚氰胺。已知BBN、缩水甘油、BMP和2-NA在艾姆斯试验中呈阳性,预计它们在无细胞毒性的情况下会产生DNA损伤。BITC、尿嘧啶和三聚氰胺在代谢活化后艾姆斯试验呈阴性,但由于细胞毒性有诱导非特异性DNA损伤的潜力。将受试化学物质连续两天每天经口给予雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠(每组五只)。在第二次给药后3小时采集膀胱样本,通过彗星试验分析尿路上皮细胞,并进行组织病理学检查以评估细胞毒性。在用BBN、缩水甘油和BMP处理的大鼠膀胱中,检测到了DNA损伤。相比之下,2-NA既未诱导DNA损伤也未诱导细胞毒性。在观察到一些组织病理学变化的情况下,非遗传毒性化学物质(BITC、尿嘧啶和三聚氰胺)未在膀胱中诱导DNA损伤。结果表明,彗星试验可以区分遗传毒性和非遗传毒性化学物质,且未获得假阳性反应。