Lee Ming-Ching, Kadota Kyuichi, Buitrago Daniel, Jones David R, Adusumilli Prasad S
1 Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA ; 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan ; 3 Center for Cell Engineering, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10065, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Oct;6(Suppl 5):S568-80. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.09.13.
A new histologic classification of lung adenocarcinoma was proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) in 2011 to provide uniform terminology and diagnostic criteria for multidisciplinary strategic management. This classification proposed a comprehensive histologic subtyping (lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid pattern) and a semi-quantitative assessment of histologic patterns (in 5% increments) in an effort to choose a single, predominant pattern in invasive adenocarcinomas. The prognostic value of this classification has been validated in large, independent cohorts from multiple countries. In patients who underwent curative-intent surgery, those with either an adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or a minimal invasive adenocarcinoma have nearly 100% disease-free survival and are designated "low grade tumors". For invasive adenocarcinomas, the acinar and papillary predominant histologic subtypes were usually designated as "intermediate grade" while the solid and micropapillary predominant histologic subtypes were designated "high grade" tumors; this was based on the statistic difference of overall survival. This classification, coupled with additional prognostic factors [nuclear grade, cribriform pattern, high Ki-67 labeling index, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) immunohistochemistry, immune markers, and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography (PET)] that we have published on, could further stratify patients into prognostic subgroups and may prove helpful for individual patient care. With regard to Chinese oncologists, the implementation of this new classification only requires hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and basic pathologic training, both of which require no additional costs. More importantly, this new classification system could provide informative data for better selection and stratification of clinical trials and molecular studies.
2011年,国际肺癌研究协会、美国胸科学会和欧洲呼吸学会(IASLC/ATS/ERS)提出了一种新的肺腺癌组织学分类方法,旨在为多学科战略管理提供统一的术语和诊断标准。该分类提出了全面的组织学亚型分类(鳞屑状、腺泡状、乳头状、微乳头状和实性模式)以及组织学模式的半定量评估(以5%的增量),以便在浸润性腺癌中选择单一的主要模式。这一分类的预后价值已在来自多个国家的大型独立队列中得到验证。在接受根治性手术的患者中,原位腺癌(AIS)或微浸润腺癌患者的无病生存率接近100%,被指定为“低级别肿瘤”。对于浸润性腺癌,以腺泡状和乳头状为主的组织学亚型通常被指定为“中级”,而以实性和微乳头状为主的组织学亚型被指定为“高级”肿瘤;这是基于总生存的统计学差异。这一分类,再加上我们已发表的其他预后因素[核级别、筛状模式、高Ki-67标记指数、甲状腺转录因子-1(TTF-1)免疫组化、免疫标记物以及正电子发射断层扫描(PET)上的(18)F-氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取],可以进一步将患者分层为预后亚组,并可能有助于个体患者的护理。对于中国肿瘤学家而言,实施这一新分类仅需要苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色切片以及基础病理学培训,这两者都无需额外费用。更重要的是,这一新分类系统可以为更好地选择和分层临床试验及分子研究提供信息数据。