Bozat-Emre Songul, Doupe Malcolm, Kozyrskyj Anita L, Grymonpre Ruby, Mahmud Salaheddin M
Vaccine and Drug Evaluation Centre, Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;30(8):842-50. doi: 10.1002/gps.4223. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
The purpose of this study is to assess whether atypical antipsychotic drug (AAD) use is associated with increased risk of falling among older (≥65 years) nursing home (NH) residents.
We conducted a nested case-control study using Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set 2.0 (RAI-MDS(©)) for NHs to identify falls, and population-based administrative healthcare databases to measure drug use and other study covariates. Cases (n = 626) were NH residents in Winnipeg, Canada, who had a fall between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2007, and were matched to four controls on age, sex, and length of NH stay (n = 2388).
While the odds of falling were statistically greater for AAD users versus nonusers (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), this association was type and dose dependent. Compared to nonusers, the odds of falling were greater for high-dose (>150 mg/day) quetiapine users and for high-dose (>2 mg/day) risperidone users. On the other hand, olanzapine (regardless of dose), low-dose quetiapine, and low-dose risperidone use were not associated with increased fall risk. Furthermore, the effect of AAD use, in general, on the risk of falling was significantly greater for people with wandering problems (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1).
Our findings suggest greater risk of falling with high-dose quetiapine use and with high-dose risperidone use among NH residents. In addition, the effect of AAD use was greater for people who frequently wander. Further research is needed to confirm these findings, and to address other important unanswered questions about the safest dose and duration of AAD use.
本研究旨在评估使用非典型抗精神病药物(AAD)是否会增加老年(≥65岁)养老院(NH)居民跌倒的风险。
我们进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,使用养老院居民评估工具最低数据集2.0(RAI-MDS(©))来识别跌倒情况,并利用基于人群的行政医疗保健数据库来衡量药物使用情况和其他研究协变量。病例组(n = 626)为加拿大温尼伯市的养老院居民,他们在2005年4月1日至2007年3月31日期间发生过跌倒,并根据年龄、性别和在养老院的居住时长与4名对照组进行匹配(n = 2388)。
虽然使用AAD的居民跌倒几率在统计学上高于未使用者(比值比[OR]=1.6,95%置信区间[CI]为1.1 - 2.3),但这种关联与药物类型和剂量有关。与未使用者相比,高剂量(>150毫克/天)喹硫平使用者和高剂量(>2毫克/天)利培酮使用者跌倒的几率更高。另一方面,使用奥氮平(无论剂量如何)、低剂量喹硫平和低剂量利培酮与跌倒风险增加无关。此外,一般而言,使用AAD对有徘徊问题的人跌倒风险的影响显著更大(OR = 1.8,95% CI为1.1 - 3.1)。
我们的研究结果表明,养老院居民中高剂量使用喹硫平和高剂量使用利培酮会增加跌倒风险。此外,使用AAD对经常徘徊的人影响更大。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现,并解决关于AAD使用的最安全剂量和持续时间的其他重要未解答问题。