Carragher Natacha, Byrnes Joshua, Doran Christopher M, Shakeshaft Anthony
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 22-32 King Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2031, Australia .
Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Australia .
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Oct 1;92(10):726-33. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.130708. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
To demonstrate the development and feasibility of a tool to assess the adequacy of national policies aimed at reducing alcohol consumption and related problems.
We developed a quantitative tool - the Toolkit for Evaluating Alcohol policy Stringency and Enforcement (TEASE-16) - to assess the level of stringency and enforcement of 16 alcohol control policies. TEASE-16 was applied to policy data from nine study areas in the western Pacific: Australia, China excluding Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), Hong Kong SAR, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore and Viet Nam. Correlation and regression analyses were then used to examine the relationship between alcohol policy scores and income-adjusted levels of alcohol consumption per capita.
Vast differences exist in how alcohol control policies are implemented in the western Pacific. Out of a possible 100 points, the nine study areas achieved TEASE-16 scores that ranged from 24.1 points for the Philippines to 67.5 points for Australia. Study areas with high policy scores - indicating relatively strong alcohol policy frameworks - had lower alcohol consumption per capita. Sensitivity analyses indicated scores and rankings for each study area remained relatively stable across different weighting schemes, indicating that TEASE-16 was robust.
TEASE-16 could be used by international and national regulatory bodies and policy-makers to guide the design, implementation, evaluation and refinement of effective policies to reduce alcohol consumption and related problems.
展示一种用于评估旨在减少酒精消费及相关问题的国家政策是否充分的工具的开发情况及可行性。
我们开发了一种定量工具——酒精政策严格性与执行情况评估工具包(TEASE - 16)——以评估16项酒精控制政策的严格程度和执行水平。TEASE - 16应用于西太平洋九个研究地区的政策数据:澳大利亚、中国(不包括香港特别行政区)、香港特别行政区、日本、马来西亚、新西兰、菲律宾、新加坡和越南。然后使用相关性和回归分析来检验酒精政策得分与经收入调整的人均酒精消费水平之间的关系。
西太平洋地区在酒精控制政策的实施方式上存在巨大差异。在满分100分的情况下,九个研究地区的TEASE - 16得分从菲律宾的24.1分到澳大利亚的67.5分不等。政策得分高的研究地区——表明酒精政策框架相对较强——人均酒精消费量较低。敏感性分析表明,每个研究地区的得分和排名在不同加权方案下保持相对稳定,这表明TEASE - 16具有稳健性。
国际和国家监管机构以及政策制定者可以使用TEASE - 16来指导有效政策的设计、实施、评估和完善,以减少酒精消费及相关问题。