Djordjevic Olivera, Konstantinovic Ljubica, Miljkovic Nadica, Bijelic Goran
*Clinic for Rehabilitation, "Dr M. Zotovic" †Faculty of Medicine ‡Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade §Tecnalia Serbia Ltd., Belgrade, Serbia.
Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10):893-902. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000179.
To compare the relative thickness change of the transversal abdominal (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles during activation in individuals with and without low back pain (LBP), and to establish a relationship between surface electromyography (sEMG) signal amplitude and the relative thickness change of the corresponding muscle during clinically relevant activity, with preferential activation of TrA/LM.
Thirty-seven pain-free participants and 36 LBP patients were assessed by ultrasound for thickness changes of TrA and LM and by sEMG for changes of electrical activity of the same muscles. sEMG is done with wireless LUMBIA system. The position of the sEMG sensors and activation maneuvers were chosen carefully.
Significant group effect was found for relative thickness change of TrA (F1,142=60.69, P<0.0001) and LM (F1,142=36.01, P<0.0001). We found significant correlations between relative thickness change of TrA and sEMG signal amplitude on both sides for LBP (r=0.46 to 0.63, P<0.05) and pain-free patients (r=0.43-0.47, P<0.05). The correlation between LM thickness change and sEMG was significant in pain-free participants for both sides (r=0.36 to 0.38 P<0.05), and right LM in LBP participants (r=0.43, P<0.05), but not for LM in LBP group (r=0.16, P=0.351).
US and sEMG measurements can be used for objective TrA/LM assessment. Correlation results suggest that the relative change of the muscle thickness could be used as the indicator of the muscle activity. Insight into the activity of TrA/LM in pain-free individuals and LBP patients during and after painful episodes may clarify the role of functional abnormalities of these muscles in LBP.
比较有和没有下腰痛(LBP)的个体在激活过程中腹横肌(TrA)和腰多裂肌(LM)的相对厚度变化,并建立表面肌电图(sEMG)信号幅度与临床相关活动期间相应肌肉相对厚度变化之间的关系,优先激活TrA/LM。
通过超声评估37名无疼痛参与者和36名LBP患者的TrA和LM厚度变化,并通过sEMG评估相同肌肉的电活动变化。sEMG使用无线LUMBIA系统进行。sEMG传感器的位置和激活动作经过精心选择。
发现TrA(F1,142=60.69,P<0.0001)和LM(F1,142=36.01,P<0.0001)的相对厚度变化存在显著的组效应。我们发现,LBP患者(r=0.46至0.63,P<0.05)和无疼痛患者(r=0.43 - 0.47,P<0.05)两侧TrA的相对厚度变化与sEMG信号幅度之间存在显著相关性。在无疼痛参与者中,两侧LM厚度变化与sEMG之间存在显著相关性(r=0.36至0.38,P<0.05),在LBP参与者中右侧LM存在显著相关性(r=0.43,P<0.05),但LBP组的LM不存在显著相关性(r=0.16,P=0.351)。
超声和sEMG测量可用于客观评估TrA/LM。相关性结果表明,肌肉厚度的相对变化可作为肌肉活动的指标。深入了解无疼痛个体和LBP患者在疼痛发作期间和之后TrA/LM的活动情况,可能有助于阐明这些肌肉功能异常在LBP中的作用。