Chládek Petr, Musálek Martin, Trč Tomáš, Zahradník Petr, Kos Petr
Paediatric and Adult Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, 2nd School of Medicine, Charles University, Teaching Hospital in Motol, Prague, Czech Republic,
Int Orthop. 2015 Mar;39(3):417-22. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2574-9. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of hip preserving surgery for femoroacetabular impingement relative to the condition resulting in FAI and to the patient's age at the time of the surgery.
With the conditions for exclusion duly met, enrolled in our study were a total of 100 hip joints (83 operated on with the aid of SHD, 17 with AMIS). The minimum follow-up period was 12 months, and the mean follow-up time was three years four months. WOMAC and NAHS questionnaires were used as rating instruments. To analyse the significance of the differences relative to the age at the time of surgery and to the basic diagnosis leading to FAI and subsequently to surgical operation we used non-parametric forms of analysis of variance (Friedman test and Kruskal-Wallis test), i.e., comparisons of the patients' pre-operative and postoperative states, estimation of the rate of improvement in the postoperative functional skills in relation to the age at the time of surgery and/or relative to the basic diagnosis necessitating surgical intervention, with respect to statistical significance at the level of p < 0.05.
As testing of our cohort of patients and results analysis showed, the youngest group (<30 years) compared with the rest of the cohort shows greater postoperative improvement and consequently also a better surgical result. Proof was also obtained that the diagnosis leading to surgery for FAI has no effect on the patient's pre- or postoperative state or on the degree of improvement.
The results of the study affirm the relevance of hip preserving surgery, especially in younger-aged groups.
本研究旨在评估针对股骨髋臼撞击症的保髋手术的结果,该结果与导致股骨髋臼撞击症的病情以及手术时患者的年龄相关。
在完全满足排除条件后,我们的研究共纳入了100个髋关节(83个借助SHD进行手术,17个采用AMIS手术)。最短随访期为12个月,平均随访时间为三年零四个月。使用WOMAC和NAHS问卷作为评分工具。为分析与手术时年龄以及导致股骨髋臼撞击症并随后进行手术的基本诊断相关的差异的显著性,我们使用了非参数方差分析形式(弗里德曼检验和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验),即比较患者术前和术后状态,评估术后功能技能改善率与手术时年龄和/或与需要手术干预的基本诊断的关系,显著性水平为p < 0.05。
对我们的患者队列进行测试和结果分析表明,最年轻的组(<30岁)与队列中的其他组相比,术后改善更大,因此手术结果也更好。还证明导致股骨髋臼撞击症手术的诊断对患者术前或术后状态或改善程度没有影响。
该研究结果证实了保髋手术的相关性,特别是在年轻人群体中。