Motomura Yasuaki, Akahoshi Kazuya, Gibo Junya, Kanayama Kenji, Fukuda Shinichiro, Hamada Shouhei, Otsuka Yoshihiro, Kubokawa Masaru, Kajiyama Kiyoshi, Nakamura Kazuhiko
Yasuaki Motomura, Kazuya Akahoshi, Junya Gibo, Kenji Kanayama, Shinichiro Fukuda, Shouhei Hamada, Yoshihiro Otsuka, Masaru Kubokawa, Department of Gastroenterology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka 820-8505, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15797-804. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15797.
To investigate the causes and intraoperative detection of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforations to support immediate or early diagnosis.
Consecutive patients who underwent ERCP procedures at our hospital between January 2008 and June 2013 were retrospectively enrolled in the study (n = 2674). All procedures had been carried out using digital fluoroscopic assistance with the patient under conscious sedation. For patients showing alterations in the gastrointestinal anatomy, a short-type double balloon enteroscope had been applied. Cases of perforation had been identified by the presence of air in or leakage of contrast medium into the retroperitoneal space, or upon endoscopic detection of an abdominal cavity related to the perforated lumen. For patients with ERCP-related perforations, the data on medical history, endoscopic findings, radiologic findings, diagnostic methods, management, and clinical outcomes were used for descriptive analysis.
Of the 2674 ERCP procedures performed during the 71-mo study period, only six (0.22%) resulted in perforations (male/female, 2/4; median age: 84 years; age range: 57-97 years). The cases included an endoscope-related duodenal perforation, two periampullary perforations related to endoscopic sphincterotomy, two periampullary perforations related to endoscopic papillary balloon dilation, and a periampullary or bile duct perforation secondary to endoscopic instrument trauma. No cases of guidewire-related perforation occurred. The video endoscope system employed in all procedures was only able to immediately detect the endoscope-related perforation; the other five perforation cases were all detected by subsequent digital fluoroscope applied intraoperatively (at a median post-ERCP intervention time of 15 min). Three out of the six total perforation cases, including the single case of endoscope-related duodenal injury, were surgically treated; the remaining three cases were treated with conservative management, including trans-arterial embolization to control the bleeding in one of the cases. All patients recovered without further incident.
ERCP-related perforations may be difficult to diagnose by video endoscope and digital fluoroscope detection of retroperitoneal free air or contrast medium leakage can facilitate diagnosis.
探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)相关穿孔的原因及术中检测方法,以支持即时或早期诊断。
回顾性纳入2008年1月至2013年6月在我院接受ERCP手术的连续患者(n = 2674)。所有手术均在患者清醒镇静状态下使用数字荧光透视辅助进行。对于胃肠道解剖结构改变的患者,应用了短型双气囊小肠镜。穿孔病例通过腹膜后间隙内出现气体或造影剂漏入,或内镜检查发现与穿孔管腔相关的腹腔来确定。对于ERCP相关穿孔的患者,病史、内镜检查结果、影像学检查结果、诊断方法、治疗及临床结局等数据用于描述性分析。
在71个月的研究期间进行的2674例ERCP手术中,仅6例(0.22%)发生穿孔(男/女,2/4;年龄中位数:84岁;年龄范围:57 - 97岁)。病例包括1例与内镜相关的十二指肠穿孔、2例与内镜括约肌切开术相关的壶腹周围穿孔、2例与内镜乳头气囊扩张术相关的壶腹周围穿孔以及1例因内镜器械创伤导致的壶腹周围或胆管穿孔。未发生与导丝相关的穿孔病例。所有手术中使用的视频内镜系统仅能即时检测到与内镜相关的穿孔;其他5例穿孔病例均在术中随后应用数字荧光透视时检测到(ERCP干预后中位时间为15分钟)。6例穿孔病例中有3例,包括1例与内镜相关的十二指肠损伤单例,接受了手术治疗;其余3例采用保守治疗,其中1例采用经动脉栓塞控制出血。所有患者均康复,无进一步不良事件。
ERCP相关穿孔可能难以通过视频内镜诊断,而数字荧光透视检测腹膜后游离气体或造影剂漏出有助于诊断。