Suppr超能文献

神经调节通气辅助用于急性呼吸衰竭的早产儿。

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm neonates with acute respiratory failure.

作者信息

Longhini Federico, Ferrero Federica, De Luca Daniele, Cosi Gianluca, Alemani Moreno, Colombo Davide, Cammarota Gianmaria, Berni Paola, Conti Giorgio, Bona Gianni, Della Corte Francesco, Navalesi Paolo

机构信息

Department of Translational Medicine, Eastern Piedmont University 'A. Avogadro', Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Neonatology. 2015;107(1):60-7. doi: 10.1159/000367886. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a novel mode of ventilation that has been demonstrated to improve infant-ventilator interaction, compared to the conventional modes in retrospective and short-term studies.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively evaluate the physiologic effects of NAVA in comparison with pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) in two nonrandomized 12-hour periods.

METHODS

We studied 14 consecutive intubated preterm neonates receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Peak airway pressure (Pawpeak), diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi), tidal volume (VT), mechanical (RRmec) and neural (RRneu) respiratory rates, neural apneas, and the capillary arterialized blood gases were measured. The RRmec-to-RRneu ratio (MNR) and the asynchrony index were also calculated. The amount of fentanyl administered was recorded.

RESULTS

Pawpeak and VT were greater in PRVC (p < 0.01). Blood gases and RRmec were not different between modes, while RRneu and the EAdi swings were greater in NAVA (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). MNR and the asynchrony index were remarkably lower in NAVA than in PRVC (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001, respectively). 1,841 neural apneas were observed during PRVC, with none in NAVA. Less fentanyl was administered during NAVA, as opposed to PRVC (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In acutely ill preterm neonates, NAVA can be safely and efficiently applied for 12 consecutive hours. Compared to PRVC, NAVA is well tolerated with fewer sedatives.

摘要

背景

神经调节通气辅助(NAVA)是一种新型通气模式,在回顾性研究和短期研究中已证明与传统模式相比,它可改善婴儿与呼吸机的相互作用。

目的

前瞻性评估在两个非随机的12小时时间段内,NAVA与压力调节容量控制(PRVC)相比的生理效应。

方法

我们研究了14例因急性呼吸衰竭接受机械通气的连续插管早产新生儿。测量了气道峰压(Pawpeak)、膈肌电活动(EAdi)、潮气量(VT)、机械通气频率(RRmec)和神经呼吸频率(RRneu)、神经源性呼吸暂停以及毛细血管动脉化血气。还计算了RRmec与RRneu的比值(MNR)和不同步指数。记录了芬太尼的给药量。

结果

PRVC模式下的Pawpeak和VT更高(p < 0.01)。两种模式下的血气和RRmec无差异,而NAVA模式下的RRneu和EAdi波动更大(分别为p = 0.02和p < 0.001)。NAVA模式下的MNR和不同步指数显著低于PRVC模式(分别为p = 0.03和p < 0.001)。在PRVC期间观察到1841次神经源性呼吸暂停,而NAVA期间未观察到。与PRVC相反,NAVA期间使用的芬太尼较少(p < 0.01)。

结论

在急性病早产新生儿中,NAVA可安全有效地连续应用12小时。与PRVC相比,NAVA耐受性良好,镇静剂使用较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验