Engdahl Emma, Lidskog Rolf
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Aug;23(6):703-17. doi: 10.1177/0963662512460953.
Current discussions on public trust, as well as on risk communication, have a restricted rationalistic bias in which the cognitive-reflexive aspect of trust is emphasized at the expense of its emotional aspect. This article contributes to a substantive theory of trust by exploring its emotional character. Drawing on recent discussions in science and technology studies, social psychology, and general social theory, it argues that trust is a modality of action that is relational, emotional, asymmetrical, and anticipatory. Hence, trust does not develop through information and the uptake of knowledge but through emotional involvement and sense-making. The implications of this conception of trust for public understandings of science and for risk communication are discussed.
当前关于公众信任以及风险沟通的讨论存在一种受限的理性主义偏见,即在强调信任的认知反思层面时,却忽视了其情感层面。本文通过探究信任的情感特质,为信任的实质性理论做出贡献。借鉴科学技术研究、社会心理学和一般社会理论中的最新讨论,本文认为信任是一种行动模式,具有关系性、情感性、不对称性和预期性。因此,信任并非通过信息和知识的获取而发展,而是通过情感投入和意义建构来发展。本文还讨论了这种信任概念对公众对科学的理解以及风险沟通的影响。