Suppr超能文献

评估北美中央癌症登记协会(NAACCR)的数据在基于人群的癌症生存研究中的应用。

Evaluation of North American Association of Central Cancer Registries' (NAACCR) data for use in population-based cancer survival studies.

作者信息

Weir Hannah K, Johnson Christopher J, Mariotto Angela B, Turner Donna, Wilson Reda J, Nishri Diane, Ward Kevin C

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (HKW, RJW); Cancer Data Registry of Idaho, Boise, ID (CJJ); Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (ABM); Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada (DT); Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada (DN); Georgia Center for Cancer Statistics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (KCW).

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):198-209. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu018.

Abstract

Follow-up procedures vary among cancer registries in North America. US registries are funded by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and/or the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). SEER registries ascertain vital status and date of last contact to meet follow-up standards. NPCR and Canadian registries primarily conduct linkages with local and national death records to ascertain deaths. Data on patients diagnosed between 2002 through 2006 and followed through 2007 were obtained from 51 registries. Registries that met follow-up standards or, at a minimum, conducted linkages with local and national death records had comparable age-standardized five-year survival estimates (all sites and races combined): 63.9% SEER, 63.1% NPCR, and 62.6% Canada. Estimates varied by cancer site. Survival data from registries using different follow-up procedures are comparable if death ascertainment is complete and all nondeceased patients are presumed to be alive to the end of the study period.

摘要

北美各癌症登记机构的随访程序各不相同。美国的登记机构由监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划和/或国家癌症登记计划(NPCR)资助。SEER登记机构确定生命状态和最后一次接触日期,以符合随访标准。NPCR和加拿大的登记机构主要与地方和国家死亡记录进行关联,以确定死亡情况。从51个登记机构获取了2002年至2006年期间诊断并随访至2007年的患者数据。符合随访标准或至少与地方和国家死亡记录进行关联的登记机构,其年龄标准化的五年生存率估计值相当(所有部位和种族合并):SEER为63.9%,NPCR为63.1%,加拿大为62.6%。估计值因癌症部位而异。如果死亡确定完整且所有未死亡患者在研究期结束时均被假定存活,则使用不同随访程序的登记机构的生存数据具有可比性。

相似文献

3
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics.
Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2785-2800. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31551. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
The impact of follow-up type and missed deaths on population-based cancer survival studies for Hispanics and Asians.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):210-7. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu016.
8
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part I: National cancer statistics.
Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2225-2249. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32802. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
The Burden of Rare Cancers in North America.
J Registry Manag. 2023 Winter;50(4):123-137.

引用本文的文献

3
Health insurance coverage among incident cancer cases from population-based cancer registries in 49 US states, 2010-2019.
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Jan 11;2(1):qxad083. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad083. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Building Data Infrastructure for Disease-Focused Health Economics Research.
Med Care. 2023 Dec 1;61(12 Suppl 2):S147-S152. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001904. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
8
Finding "Zombies" in Your Database by Confirming Vital Status.
J Registry Manag. 2023 Summer;50(2):57-59.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of state-specific life tables on relative survival.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):218-27. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu017.
2
The impact of follow-up type and missed deaths on population-based cancer survival studies for Hispanics and Asians.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):210-7. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu016.
3
The effect of multiple primary rules on population-based cancer survival.
Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Jun;24(6):1231-42. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0203-3. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
4
The impact of National Death Index linkages on population-based cancer survival rates in the United States.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;37(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
6
Cancer survival among Latinos and the Hispanic Paradox.
Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Apr;22(4):553-61. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9727-6. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
7
Improved estimates of cancer-specific survival rates from population-based data.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 20;102(20):1584-98. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq366. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
9
Population-based cancer survival trends in England and Wales up to 2007: an assessment of the NHS cancer plan for England.
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):351-69. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70028-2. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
10
Life tables for world-wide comparison of relative survival for cancer (CONCORD study).
Tumori. 2008 Sep-Oct;94(5):658-68. doi: 10.1177/030089160809400503.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验