Frost Charles, Song Yan, Barrett Yu Chen, Wang Jessie, Pursley Janice, Boyd Rebecca A, LaCreta Frank
Exploratory Clinical and Translational Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Exploratory Development Global Biometric Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov 13;6:179-87. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S61131. eCollection 2014.
Currently, there are no direct comparisons of apixaban and rivaroxaban, two new oral direct factor Xa inhibitors approved for management of thromboembolic disorders.
Compare the pharmacokinetics and anti-factor Xa activity (AXA) of apixaban and rivaroxaban.
In this randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment crossover study, healthy subjects (N=14) received apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (BID) and rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily (QD) for 4 days with a ≥4.5-day washout. Plasma samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic and AXA assessments; parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods.
Median time-to-maximum concentration was 2 hours for both compounds, and the mean half-life was 8.7 and 7.9 hours for apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively. Daily exposure, the area under the curve (AUC(0-24)), appeared similar for rivaroxaban (1,094 ng · h/mL) and apixaban (935 ng · h/mL), whereas mean peak-to-trough plasma concentration ratio was 3.6-fold greater for rivaroxaban (16.9) than apixaban (4.7). Coefficient of variation for exposure parameters (AUC0-24, Cmax, Cmin) was 20%-24% for apixaban versus 29%-46% for rivaroxaban. Peak AXA, AXA AUC(0-24), and AXA fluctuation were ~2.5-, 1.3-, and 3.5-fold higher for rivaroxaban than apixaban, respectively. Trough concentrations and AXA were lower for rivaroxaban (10 ng/mL and 0.17 IU/mL vs 17 ng/mL and 0.24 IU/mL for apixaban, respectively). Rivaroxaban exhibited a steeper concentration-AXA response (slope: 0.0172 IU/ng vs 0.0134 IU/ng for apixaban, P<0.0001).
Apixaban 2.5 mg BID demonstrated less intersubject variability in exposure, lower AXA AUC, and higher trough and smaller peak-to-trough fluctuations in plasma concentration and AXA, suggesting more constant anticoagulation compared with rivaroxaban 10 mg QD. However, the clinical impact of these differences on the relative efficacy and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban remains to be determined.
目前,阿哌沙班和利伐沙班这两种被批准用于治疗血栓栓塞性疾病的新型口服直接Xa因子抑制剂尚未进行直接对比。
比较阿哌沙班和利伐沙班的药代动力学及抗Xa因子活性(AXA)。
在这项随机、开放标签、两阶段、双治疗交叉研究中,14名健康受试者接受阿哌沙班2.5毫克每日两次(BID)和利伐沙班10毫克每日一次(QD)治疗4天,洗脱期≥4.5天。采集血浆样本进行药代动力学和AXA评估;使用非房室方法计算参数。
两种化合物的达峰时间中位数均为2小时,阿哌沙班和利伐沙班的平均半衰期分别为8.7小时和7.9小时。利伐沙班(1094纳克·小时/毫升)和阿哌沙班(935纳克·小时/毫升)的每日暴露量,即曲线下面积(AUC(0 - 24))似乎相似,而利伐沙班(16.9)的平均峰谷血浆浓度比是阿哌沙班(4.7)的3.6倍。阿哌沙班暴露参数(AUC0 - 24、Cmax、Cmin)的变异系数为20% - 24%,而利伐沙班为29% - 46%。利伐沙班的AXA峰值、AXA AUC(0 - 24)和AXA波动分别比阿哌沙班高约2.5倍、1.3倍和3.5倍。利伐沙班的谷浓度和AXA较低(分别为10纳克/毫升和0.17国际单位/毫升,而阿哌沙班为17纳克/毫升和0.24国际单位/毫升)。利伐沙班表现出更陡峭的浓度 - AXA反应(斜率:0.0172国际单位/纳克,阿哌沙班为0.0134国际单位/纳克,P<0.0001)。
阿哌沙班2.5毫克每日两次在暴露方面的个体间变异性较小,AXA AUC较低,血浆浓度和AXA的谷浓度较高且峰谷波动较小,表明与利伐沙班10毫克每日一次相比,抗凝作用更持续。然而,这些差异对阿哌沙班和利伐沙班相对疗效和安全性的临床影响仍有待确定。