Suppr超能文献

氟达拉滨与白消安的减低剂量预处理方案对比氟达拉滨与美法仑用于急性髓细胞白血病患者:欧洲血液与骨髓移植组急性白血病工作组的报告

Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan versus fludarabine and melphalan for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

作者信息

Baron Frédéric, Labopin Myriam, Peniket Andy, Jindra Pavel, Afanasyev Boris, Sanz Miguel A, Deconinck Eric, Nagler Arnon, Mohty Mohamad

机构信息

Department of Hematology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

出版信息

Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;121(7):1048-55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29163. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fludarabine plus busulfan (FB) and fludarabine plus melphalan (FM) are 2 widely used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT).

METHODS

The current survey compared transplantation outcomes for a cohort of 394 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients given bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings after FB (n = 218) or FM (n = 176). Patients given manipulated grafts and those given T-cell-depleting agents (anti-thymocyte globulins or alemtuzumab) were not included.

RESULTS

At the time of transplantation, 266 patients (68%) were experiencing their first complete remission (CR), 69 (18%) were experiencing a later CR, and 59 (15%) had advanced disease. The incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were similar in the 2 groups of patients. The 2-year relapse incidence (RI), nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate, leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate, and overall survival (OS) rate were 31% ± 3%, 18% ± 3%, 51% ± 4%, and 54% ± 4%, respectively, for FB patients and 20% ± 3% (P = .007), 20% ± 3% (P = .4), 60% ± 4% (P = .08), and 62% ± 4% (P = .2), respectively, for FM patients. Among FB patients given intravenous busulfan (n = 81), the 2-year RI, NRM, LFS, and OS rates were 26% ± 5% (P = .43 vs FM patients), 25% ± 6% (P = .18), 49% ± 7% (P = .07), and 54% ± 7% (P = .13), respectively. In multivariate analyses, FM was associated with a lower RI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; P = .01) and a trend toward higher NRM (HR, 1.6; P = .1) with similar LFS (HR, 0.8; P = .2) and OS (HR, 0.9; P = .6).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that although FM provides better AML control than FB as an RIC regimen for allo-SCT, the 2 regimens provide similar survival. Multicenter randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

氟达拉滨联合白消安(FB)和氟达拉滨联合美法仑(FM)是异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-SCT)中两种广泛使用的减低强度预处理(RIC)方案。

方法

本研究比较了394例急性髓系白血病(AML)患者接受来自人类白细胞抗原相同同胞的骨髓或外周血干细胞移植后的移植结局,其中218例接受FB方案,176例接受FM方案。排除接受过处理的移植物患者和接受T细胞清除剂(抗胸腺细胞球蛋白或阿仑单抗)的患者。

结果

移植时,266例患者(68%)处于首次完全缓解(CR)期,69例(18%)处于后续CR期,59例(15%)为进展期疾病。两组患者急慢性移植物抗宿主病的发生率相似。FB组患者的2年复发率(RI)、非复发死亡率(NRM)、无白血病生存率(LFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为31%±3%、18%±3%、51%±4%和54%±4%,FM组患者分别为20%±3%(P = 0.007)、20%±3%(P = 0.4)、60%±4%(P = 0.08)和62%±4%(P = 0.2)。在接受静脉白消安的FB组患者(n = 81)中,2年RI、NRM、LFS和OS率分别为26%±5%(与FM组患者相比,P = 0.43)、25%±6%(P = 0.18)、49%±7%(P = 0.07)和54%±7%(P = 0.13)。多因素分析显示,FM与较低的RI(风险比[HR],0.5;P = 0.01)相关,NRM有升高趋势(HR,1.6;P = 0.1),LFS(HR,0.8;P = 0.2)和OS(HR,0.9;P = 0.6)相似。

结论

这些结果表明,虽然作为allo-SCT的RIC方案,FM比FB能更好地控制AML,但两种方案的生存率相似。需要多中心随机研究来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验