Roulstone Victoria, Khan Khurum, Pandha Hardev S, Rudman Sarah, Coffey Matt, Gill George M, Melcher Alan A, Vile Richard, Harrington Kevin J, de Bono Johann, Spicer James
Chester Beatty Laboratories, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Postgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 15;21(6):1305-12. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1770. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Reovirus is a wild-type oncolytic virus that is ubiquitous in the environment; most patients are therefore preimmune. Therapeutic administration leads to an increase in neutralizing antireovirus antibody (NARA) titer. We hypothesized that if NARA limited reovirus antitumor activity, the effect might be attenuated by coadministration of cyclophosphamide.
In a phase I study, patients with advanced cancer received cyclophosphamide 3 days before intravenous reovirus serotype 3 Dearing (RT3D). The primary objective was to reduce the resulting rise in NARA titer. Cyclophosphamide dose was escalated from 25-1,000 mg/m(2) through nine cohorts; we aimed to define a well-tolerated immunomodulatory dose.
The combination was well tolerated in 36 patients, with grade 3/4 toxicities only seen at or above the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide, which was 800 mg/m(2) combined with reovirus. Immunosuppressive effect, defined as maintaining NARA titer rise below a predefined threshold, was observed in only one patient. Furthermore, despite expected myelosuppression seen at higher cyclophosphamide doses, no changes in T-cell subsets, including Tregs, occurred with dose escalation. Viable virus was detected in association with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 14% of patients 10 days after the last RT3D injection, despite high plasma NARA titer, demonstrating a potential mechanism for prolonged evasion of neutralization by reovirus.
Coadministration of cyclophosphamide with reovirus is safe, but does not attenuate host antiviral responses. Alternative immunomodulation approaches should be explored, but association with PBMCs may allow reovirus to persist and evade even high levels of neutralizing antibodies.
呼肠孤病毒是一种在环境中普遍存在的野生型溶瘤病毒;因此大多数患者具有预存免疫。治疗性给药会导致中和抗呼肠孤病毒抗体(NARA)滴度升高。我们推测,如果NARA限制了呼肠孤病毒的抗肿瘤活性,那么环磷酰胺的联合使用可能会减弱这种效应。
在一项I期研究中,晚期癌症患者在静脉注射3型迪尔呼肠孤病毒(RT3D)前3天接受环磷酰胺治疗。主要目的是降低由此导致的NARA滴度升高。环磷酰胺剂量从25 - 1000 mg/m² 分九个队列逐步递增;我们旨在确定一个耐受性良好的免疫调节剂量。
36例患者对该联合治疗耐受性良好,仅在环磷酰胺最大耐受剂量及以上(即800 mg/m² 与呼肠孤病毒联合使用时)出现3/4级毒性反应。仅在一名患者中观察到免疫抑制作用,即NARA滴度升高维持在预定义阈值以下。此外,尽管在较高环磷酰胺剂量下观察到预期的骨髓抑制,但随着剂量递增,包括调节性T细胞在内的T细胞亚群未发生变化。在最后一次RT3D注射后第10天,14%的患者外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)中检测到活病毒,尽管血浆NARA滴度很高,这表明呼肠孤病毒可能存在一种长期逃避中和作用的潜在机制。
环磷酰胺与呼肠孤病毒联合使用是安全的,但不会减弱宿主的抗病毒反应。应探索其他免疫调节方法,但与PBMC的关联可能使呼肠孤病毒持续存在并逃避甚至高水平的中和抗体。