Suppr超能文献

加拿大安大略省不同入院类别的移民及难民针对非精神病性疾病的心理健康护理使用情况。

Use of mental health care for nonpsychotic conditions by immigrants in different admission classes and by refugees in Ontario, Canada.

作者信息

Durbin Anna, Lin Elizabeth, Moineddin Rahim, Steele Leah S, Glazier Richard H

机构信息

Anna Durbin, MPH, is a PhD candidate in the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Elizabeth Lin, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, and a Scientist in the Provincial System Support Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Open Med. 2014 Oct 28;8(4):e136-46. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most Canadian newcomers are admitted in the economic, family, or refugee class, each of which has its own selection criteria and experiences. Evidence has shown various risks for mental health disorders across admission classes, but the respective service-use patterns for people in these classes are unknown. In this study, we compared service use for nonpsychotic mental health disorders by newcomers in various admission classes with that of long-term residents (i.e., Canadian-born persons or immigrants before 1985) in urban Ontario.

METHODS

In this population-based matched cross-sectional study, we linked health service databases to the Ontario portion of the Citizenship and Immigration Canada database. Outcomes were mental health visits to primary care physicians, mental health visits to psychiatrists, and emergency department visits or hospital admissions. We measured service use for recent immigrants (those who arrived in Ontario between 2002 and 2007; n = 359 673). We compared service use by immigrants in each admission class during the first 5 years in Canada with use by age- and sex-matched long-term residents. We measured likelihood of access to each service and intensity of use of each service using conditional logistic regression and negative binomial models.

RESULTS

Economic and family class newcomers were less likely than long-term residents to use primary mental health care. The use of primary mental health care by female refugees did not differ from that of matched long-term residents, but use of such care by male refugees was higher (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.19). Immigrants in all admission classes were less likely to use psychiatric services and hospital services for mental health care. Exceptions were men in the economic and family classes, whose intensity of hospital visits was similar to that of matched long-term residents.

INTERPRETATION

Immigrants in all admission classes generally used less care for nonpsychotic disorders than longterm residents, although male refugees used more primary care. Future research should examine how mental health needs align with service use, particularly for more vulnerable groups such as refugees.

摘要

背景

大多数加拿大新移民通过经济类、家庭类或难民类途径获得移民身份,每类都有其各自的甄选标准和经历。有证据表明,不同移民类别人群患心理健康障碍的风险各异,但这些类别人群各自的服务利用模式尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们比较了安大略省城市地区不同移民类别新移民与长期居民(即加拿大出生者或1985年前的移民)针对非精神病性心理健康障碍的服务利用情况。

方法

在这项基于人群的匹配横断面研究中,我们将卫生服务数据库与加拿大公民及移民部数据库的安大略部分进行了关联。研究结果包括对初级保健医生的心理健康就诊、对精神科医生的心理健康就诊以及急诊科就诊或住院情况。我们对近期移民(2002年至2007年间抵达安大略省的移民;n = 359 673)的服务利用情况进行了测量。我们比较了加拿大头5年中各移民类别移民与年龄和性别匹配的长期居民的服务利用情况。我们使用条件逻辑回归和负二项式模型测量了获得每项服务的可能性以及每项服务的使用强度。

结果

经济类和家庭类新移民使用初级心理健康护理的可能性低于长期居民。女性难民使用初级心理健康护理的情况与匹配的长期居民无差异,但男性难民使用此类护理的情况更多(优势比1.14,95%置信区间1.09 - 1.19)。所有移民类别中的移民使用精神科服务和心理健康护理住院服务的可能性均较低。经济类和家庭类中的男性是例外,他们的住院就诊强度与匹配的长期居民相似。

解读

所有移民类别中的移民针对非精神病性障碍的护理总体上比长期居民少,尽管男性难民使用的初级护理更多。未来的研究应考察心理健康需求与服务利用如何匹配,尤其是为难民等更弱势群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e41/4242791/4118513170aa/OpenMed-08-136-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验