Breidenstein Brenda G, Dai Shuan
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014 Nov-Dec;51(6):375-8. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20141021-01.
To compare retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening experiences using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) and wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) at centers in Auckland, New Zealand, with those of other centers in Australasia.
A web-based survey regarding methods of screening for ROP was distributed to ophthalmologists in Australia and New Zealand.
Thirty-five ophthalmologists participated in the survey, of whom 30 participated in ROP screening. Sixteen respondents used BIO exclusively, 2 used WFDRI exclusively, and 12 used both. Of these, 3 respondents used WFDRI for remote screening.
A significant proportion of ROP screeners have access to and are using WFDRI, but few currently use a telemedicine model for ROP screening.
在新西兰奥克兰的各中心,比较使用双目间接检眼镜(BIO)和广域数字视网膜成像(WFDRI)进行早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)筛查的经验,以及与澳大拉西亚其他中心的经验。
向澳大利亚和新西兰的眼科医生发放了一份关于ROP筛查方法的网络调查问卷。
35名眼科医生参与了调查,其中30名参与了ROP筛查。16名受访者仅使用BIO,2名仅使用WFDRI,12名同时使用两者。其中,3名受访者使用WFDRI进行远程筛查。
很大一部分ROP筛查人员可以使用并正在使用WFDRI,但目前很少有人使用远程医疗模式进行ROP筛查。