• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public support for a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and pro-tax messages in a Mid-Atlantic US state.美国中大西洋地区一个州对含糖饮料税及支持征税信息的公众支持情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2263-73. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002699. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
2
Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey.含糖饮料征税:2011 年全国公众意见调查结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.065.
3
Public Attitudes and Support for a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in America's Heartland.美国中部地区公众对含糖饮料税的态度与支持情况
Health Promot Pract. 2018 May;19(3):418-426. doi: 10.1177/1524839917709759. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
4
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
5
Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages.澳大利亚人是否准备好接受警告标签、营销禁令和含糖饮料税?两项横断面调查衡量了对含糖饮料的政策应对措施的支持情况。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e027962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027962.
6
Pro- and Anti-Tax Framing in News Articles About California Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Campaigns from 2014-2018.2014-2018 年关于加州含糖饮料税收运动的新闻文章中的赞成和反对税收框架。
J Health Commun. 2023 Oct 3;28(10):658-668. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2251913. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Projected Impact of Mexico's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policy on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Modeling Study.墨西哥含糖饮料税政策对糖尿病和心血管疾病的预计影响:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 1;13(11):e1002158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002158. eCollection 2016 Nov.
8
Does the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax have a signaling effect? ENSANUT 2016.墨西哥含糖饮料税是否具有信号效应?ENSANUT 2016。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0199337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199337. eCollection 2018.
9
Public perception and characteristics related to acceptance of the sugar-sweetened beverage taxation launched in France in 2012.公众对2012年法国推出的含糖饮料税的认知以及与接受度相关的特征。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Oct;18(14):2679-88. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014003231. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.智利 2014 年含糖饮料税与含糖饮料价格和购买量的变化:城市环境下的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002597. eCollection 2018 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Political economy analysis of health taxes (tobacco, alcohol drink and sugar-sweteened beverage): qualitative study of three provinces in Indonesia.卫生税(烟草、酒精饮料和含糖饮料)的政治经济学分析:印度尼西亚三个省份的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e085863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085863.
2
A Content Analysis of Online Messages about Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.对含糖饮料的在线信息进行内容分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 29;16(7):1005. doi: 10.3390/nu16071005.
3
Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Perceived Beverage Healthfulness, Tax Awareness, and Tax Opinions.费城饮料税对感知饮料健康度、税收意识和税收意见的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 May;56(5):321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
4
Attitudes of Chinese residents toward sugar-sweetened beverage tax and their willingness to pay: a cross-sectional survey.中国居民对含糖饮料税的态度及其支付意愿:一项横断面调查。
Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 25;10:1268436. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1268436. eCollection 2023.
5
Australians support for policy initiatives addressing unhealthy diet: a population-based study.澳大利亚人支持采取政策举措解决不健康饮食问题:一项基于人群的研究。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad036.
6
Low-income parents' perceptions of a sweetened beverage tax in Philadelphia.费城低收入父母对含糖饮料税的看法。
J Nutr Sci. 2022 Aug 22;11:e67. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.64. eCollection 2022.
7
Public perception of the tax on sweetened beverages in France.公众对法国含糖饮料征税的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Nov;25(11):3240-3251. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022001665. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
Evaluation of Seattle's sweetened beverage tax on tax support and perceived economic and health impacts.评估西雅图含糖饮料税对税收支持以及感知到的经济和健康影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Apr 30;27:101809. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101809. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Public Support for the Imposition of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and the Determinants of Such Support in Spain.公众对征收含糖饮料税的支持及其在西班牙的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;19(7):3758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073758.
10
Perspectives of Adult Singaporeans toward Potential Policies to Reduce the Consumption of Sugar Sweetened Beverages-A Cross-Sectional Study.新加坡成年人对减少含糖饮料消费的潜在政策的看法——一项横断面研究
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 25;13(12):4231. doi: 10.3390/nu13124231.

本文引用的文献

1
Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.美国人对减少含糖饮料消费政策的看法。
Prev Med. 2014 Jun;63:52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
Strategic messaging to promote taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: lessons from recent political campaigns.战略信息传递促进含糖饮料征税:来自近期政治运动的经验教训。
Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):847-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301679. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
3
Clustering of attitudes towards obesity: a mixed methods study of Australian parents and children.肥胖态度的聚类:一项澳大利亚父母和孩子混合方法研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Oct 12;10:117. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-117.
4
Sugar addiction: pushing the drug-sugar analogy to the limit.糖瘾:将毒品-糖类比推向极限。
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013 Jul;16(4):434-9. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328361c8b8.
5
A typology of beverage taxation: multiple approaches for obesity prevention and obesity prevention-related revenue generation.饮料税的分类:多种方法预防肥胖和产生与预防肥胖相关的收入。
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Aug;34(3):403-23. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.17. Epub 2013 May 23.
6
Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999-2010.美国青少年和成年人含糖饮料消费趋势:1999-2010 年。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jul;98(1):180-8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.057943. Epub 2013 May 15.
7
Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey.含糖饮料征税:2011 年全国公众意见调查结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.065.
8
Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable disease: a systematic review of simulation studies.食品定价策略、人群饮食和非传染性疾病:系统评价模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001353. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
9
Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes.评估食品和饮料税收及补贴政策对改善公众健康的潜在效果:对价格、需求和体重变化结果的系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2013 Feb;14(2):110-28. doi: 10.1111/obr.12002. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
10
A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children.含糖饮料和无糖饮料对儿童体重影响的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 11;367(15):1397-406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203034. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

美国中大西洋地区一个州对含糖饮料税及支持征税信息的公众支持情况。

Public support for a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and pro-tax messages in a Mid-Atlantic US state.

作者信息

Donaldson Elisabeth A, Cohen Joanna E, Rutkow Lainie, Villanti Andrea C, Kanarek Norma F, Barry Colleen L

机构信息

1Department of Health,Behavior & Society,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,615 N. Wolfe Street,Baltimore,MD 21205,USA.

3Department of Health Policy & Management,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore,MD,USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2263-73. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002699. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980014002699
PMID:25430945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4447609/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the characteristics of supporters and opponents of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax and to identify pro-tax messages that resonate with the public.

DESIGN

A survey was administered by telephone in February 2013 to assess public opinion about a penny-per-ounce tax on SSB. Support was also examined for SSB consumption reduction and pro-tax messages. Individual characteristics including sociodemographics, political affiliation, SSB consumption behaviours and beliefs were explored as predictors of support using logistic regression.

SETTING

A representative sample of voters was recruited from a Mid-Atlantic US state.

SUBJECTS

The sample included 1000 registered voters.

RESULTS

Findings indicate considerable support (50 %) for an SSB tax. Support was stronger among Democrats, those who believe SSB are a major cause of childhood obesity and those who believe childhood obesity warrants a societal intervention. Belief that a tax would be effective in lowering obesity rates was associated with support for the tax and pro-tax messages. Respondents reporting that a health-care provider had recommended they lose weight were less convinced by pro-tax messages. Women, Independents and those concerned about childhood obesity were more convinced by the SSB reduction messages. Overall, the most popular messages focused on the importance of reducing consumption among children without mentioning the tax.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding who supports and opposes SSB tax measures can assist advocates in developing strategies to maximize support for this type of intervention. Messages that focus on the effect of consumption on children may be useful in framing the discussion around SSB tax proposals.

摘要

目的

研究支持和反对含糖饮料税的人群特征,并确定能引起公众共鸣的支持征税的信息。

设计

2013年2月通过电话进行了一项调查,以评估公众对每盎司含糖饮料征收一美分税的看法。还调查了对减少含糖饮料消费和支持征税信息的态度。利用逻辑回归分析探讨了包括社会人口统计学、政治派别、含糖饮料消费行为和信念等个体特征作为支持率的预测因素。

背景

从美国中大西洋地区的一个州招募了具有代表性的选民样本。

对象

样本包括1000名登记选民。

结果

调查结果表明,相当一部分人(50%)支持征收含糖饮料税。民主党人、那些认为含糖饮料是儿童肥胖主要原因的人以及那些认为儿童肥胖需要社会干预的人支持率更高。认为税收能有效降低肥胖率与支持征税及支持征税的信息有关。报告称医疗保健提供者建议他们减肥的受访者对支持征税的信息不太信服。女性、无党派人士和那些关注儿童肥胖问题的人更容易被减少含糖饮料消费的信息所说服。总体而言,最受欢迎的信息集中在减少儿童消费的重要性上,而没有提及税收。

结论

了解谁支持和反对含糖饮料税措施有助于倡导者制定策略,以最大限度地争取对这类干预措施的支持。关注消费对儿童影响的信息可能有助于围绕含糖饮料税提案展开讨论。