Moon Sang Woo, Lim Sung Hyup, Lee Ho Young
Department of Ophthalmology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. ; Therapeutics Center for Ocular Neovascular Disease, Busan, Korea.
Shinsegae Eye Clinic, Busan, Korea.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;28(6):444-50. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.444. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
To compare the refractive results of cataract surgery measured by applanation ultrasound and the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan.
Medical records of 76 patients and 104 eyes who underwent cataract surgery from January 2013 to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Biometries were measured using ultrasound and AL-scan and intraocular lens power was calculated using the SRK-T formula. Automatic refraction examination was done 1 month after the operation, and differences between the ultrasound group and AL-scan group were compared and analyzed by mean absolute error.
Mean axial length measured preoperatively by the ultrasound method was 23.53 ± 1.17 mm while the lengths measured using the AL-scan were 0.03 mm longer than that of the ultrasound group (23.56 ± 1.15 mm). However, there was not a significant difference in this finding (p = 0.638). Mean absolute error was 0.34 ± 0.27 diopters in the ultrasound group and 0.36 ± 0.31 diopters in AL-scan group, which showed no significant difference (p = 0.946) in precision of predicting postoperative refraction.
Although the difference was not statistically significant, intraocular lens calculations done by the AL-scan were nearly similar in predicting postoperative refraction compared to those of applanation ultrasound, however more precise measurements may be obtained if the axial length is longer than 24.4 mm. Except in the case of opacity in the media, which makes obtaining measurements with the AL-scan difficult, AL-scan could be a useful biometry in cataract surgery.
比较应用压平式超声和新型部分相干干涉仪(AL-scan)测量白内障手术的屈光结果。
回顾性分析2013年1月至2013年6月期间接受白内障手术的76例患者104只眼的病历。使用超声和AL-scan测量生物参数,并使用SRK-T公式计算人工晶状体度数。术后1个月进行自动验光检查,通过平均绝对误差比较和分析超声组与AL-scan组之间的差异。
术前超声测量的平均眼轴长度为23.53±1.17mm,而使用AL-scan测量的长度比超声组长0.03mm(23.56±1.15mm)。然而,这一结果无显著差异(p=0.638)。超声组的平均绝对误差为0.34±0.27屈光度,AL-scan组为0.36±0.31屈光度,在预测术后屈光方面精度无显著差异(p=0.946)。
虽然差异无统计学意义,但与压平式超声相比,AL-scan进行的人工晶状体度数计算在预测术后屈光方面几乎相似,然而当眼轴长度大于24.4mm时可能会获得更精确的测量结果。除了因介质混浊导致难以用AL-scan进行测量的情况外,AL-scan在白内障手术中可能是一种有用的生物测量方法。