Elman Michael J, Ayala Allison, Bressler Neil M, Browning David, Flaxel Christina J, Glassman Adam R, Jampol Lee M, Stone Thomas W
Elman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
To report 5-year results from a previously reported trial evaluating intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab with prompt versus deferred (for ≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME).
Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
Among participants from the trial with 3 years of follow-up who subsequently consented to a 2-year extension and survived through 5 years, 124 (97%) and 111 (92%) completed the 5-year visit in the prompt and deferred groups, respectively.
Random assignment to ranibizumab every 4 weeks until no longer improving (with resumption if worsening) and prompt or deferred (≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment.
Best-corrected visual acuity at the 5-year visit.
The mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline to the 5-year visit was +7.2 letters in the prompt laser group compared with +9.8 letters in the deferred laser group (mean difference, -2.6 letters; 95% confidence interval, -5.5 to +0.4 letters; P = 0.09). At the 5-year visit in the prompt versus deferred laser groups, there was vision loss of ≥10 letters in 9% versus 8%, an improvement of ≥10 letters in 46% versus 58%, and an improvement of ≥15 letters in 27% versus 38% of participants, respectively. From baseline to 5 years, 56% of participants in the deferred group did not receive laser. The median number of injections was 13 versus 17 in the prompt and deferral groups, including 54% and 45% receiving no injections during year 4 and 62% and 52% receiving no injections during year 5, respectively.
Five-year results suggest focal/grid laser treatment at the initiation of intravitreal ranibizumab is no better than deferring laser treatment for ≥24 weeks in eyes with DME involving the central macula with vision impairment. Although more than half of eyes in which laser treatment is deferred may avoid laser for at least 5 years, such eyes may require more injections to achieve these results when following this protocol. Most eyes treated with ranibizumab and either prompt or deferred laser maintain vision gains obtained by the first year through 5 years with little additional treatment after 3 years.
报告一项先前报道的试验的5年结果,该试验评估了玻璃体内注射0.5毫克雷珠单抗并联合即刻与延迟(≥24周)的局部/格栅样激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的效果。
多中心随机临床试验。
在该试验中随访3年且随后同意延长2年随访并存活至5年的参与者中,即刻治疗组和延迟治疗组分别有124名(97%)和111名(92%)完成了5年的随访。
随机分配,每4周注射一次雷珠单抗,直至病情不再改善(病情恶化则恢复注射),并接受即刻或延迟(≥24周)的局部/格栅样激光治疗。
5年随访时的最佳矫正视力。
从基线到5年随访时,即刻激光治疗组的视力字母评分平均变化为+7.2,而延迟激光治疗组为+9.8(平均差值为-2.6;95%置信区间为-5.5至+0.4;P=0.09)。在即刻与延迟激光治疗组的5年随访中,视力下降≥10个字母的参与者比例分别为9%和8%,视力提高≥10个字母的参与者比例分别为46%和58%,视力提高≥15个字母的参与者比例分别为27%和38%。从基线到5年,延迟治疗组56%的参与者未接受激光治疗。即刻治疗组和延迟治疗组的注射次数中位数分别为13次和17次,其中第4年未接受注射的参与者比例分别为54%和45%,第5年未接受注射的参与者比例分别为62%和52%。
5年结果表明,对于累及黄斑中心且有视力损害的DME患者,在玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗起始时进行局部/格栅样激光治疗并不比延迟激光治疗≥24周效果更好。虽然延迟激光治疗的眼睛中超过一半可能至少5年避免接受激光治疗,但按照此方案,这类眼睛可能需要更多次注射才能达到这些结果。大多数接受雷珠单抗治疗并联合即刻或延迟激光治疗的眼睛在第1年至5年维持了视力提高,3年后几乎无需额外治疗。