Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:即时激光治疗与延迟激光治疗的5年随机试验结果

Intravitreal Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: 5-year randomized trial results.

作者信息

Elman Michael J, Ayala Allison, Bressler Neil M, Browning David, Flaxel Christina J, Glassman Adam R, Jampol Lee M, Stone Thomas W

机构信息

Elman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland.

Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report 5-year results from a previously reported trial evaluating intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab with prompt versus deferred (for ≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Among participants from the trial with 3 years of follow-up who subsequently consented to a 2-year extension and survived through 5 years, 124 (97%) and 111 (92%) completed the 5-year visit in the prompt and deferred groups, respectively.

METHODS

Random assignment to ranibizumab every 4 weeks until no longer improving (with resumption if worsening) and prompt or deferred (≥24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity at the 5-year visit.

RESULTS

The mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline to the 5-year visit was +7.2 letters in the prompt laser group compared with +9.8 letters in the deferred laser group (mean difference, -2.6 letters; 95% confidence interval, -5.5 to +0.4 letters; P = 0.09). At the 5-year visit in the prompt versus deferred laser groups, there was vision loss of ≥10 letters in 9% versus 8%, an improvement of ≥10 letters in 46% versus 58%, and an improvement of ≥15 letters in 27% versus 38% of participants, respectively. From baseline to 5 years, 56% of participants in the deferred group did not receive laser. The median number of injections was 13 versus 17 in the prompt and deferral groups, including 54% and 45% receiving no injections during year 4 and 62% and 52% receiving no injections during year 5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year results suggest focal/grid laser treatment at the initiation of intravitreal ranibizumab is no better than deferring laser treatment for ≥24 weeks in eyes with DME involving the central macula with vision impairment. Although more than half of eyes in which laser treatment is deferred may avoid laser for at least 5 years, such eyes may require more injections to achieve these results when following this protocol. Most eyes treated with ranibizumab and either prompt or deferred laser maintain vision gains obtained by the first year through 5 years with little additional treatment after 3 years.

摘要

目的

报告一项先前报道的试验的5年结果,该试验评估了玻璃体内注射0.5毫克雷珠单抗并联合即刻与延迟(≥24周)的局部/格栅样激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的效果。

设计

多中心随机临床试验。

参与者

在该试验中随访3年且随后同意延长2年随访并存活至5年的参与者中,即刻治疗组和延迟治疗组分别有124名(97%)和111名(92%)完成了5年的随访。

方法

随机分配,每4周注射一次雷珠单抗,直至病情不再改善(病情恶化则恢复注射),并接受即刻或延迟(≥24周)的局部/格栅样激光治疗。

主要观察指标

5年随访时的最佳矫正视力。

结果

从基线到5年随访时,即刻激光治疗组的视力字母评分平均变化为+7.2,而延迟激光治疗组为+9.8(平均差值为-2.6;95%置信区间为-5.5至+0.4;P=0.09)。在即刻与延迟激光治疗组的5年随访中,视力下降≥10个字母的参与者比例分别为9%和8%,视力提高≥10个字母的参与者比例分别为46%和58%,视力提高≥15个字母的参与者比例分别为27%和38%。从基线到5年,延迟治疗组56%的参与者未接受激光治疗。即刻治疗组和延迟治疗组的注射次数中位数分别为13次和17次,其中第4年未接受注射的参与者比例分别为54%和45%,第5年未接受注射的参与者比例分别为62%和52%。

结论

5年结果表明,对于累及黄斑中心且有视力损害的DME患者,在玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗起始时进行局部/格栅样激光治疗并不比延迟激光治疗≥24周效果更好。虽然延迟激光治疗的眼睛中超过一半可能至少5年避免接受激光治疗,但按照此方案,这类眼睛可能需要更多次注射才能达到这些结果。大多数接受雷珠单抗治疗并联合即刻或延迟激光治疗的眼睛在第1年至5年维持了视力提高,3年后几乎无需额外治疗。

相似文献

1
Intravitreal Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: 5-year randomized trial results.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
2
Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: three-year randomized trial results.
Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.022. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
4
Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema.
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1064-1077.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
8
The REVEAL Study: Ranibizumab Monotherapy or Combined with Laser versus Laser Monotherapy in Asian Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul;122(7):1402-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 May 14.
9

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Cessation in Patients with Diabetic Maculopathy under Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy Following a Treat-and-Extend Protocol.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Jun 2;5(6):100838. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100838. eCollection 2025 Nov-Dec.
5
Brolucizumab versus aflibercept for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema in Indian real-world scenario - The BRADIR study.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2024 Aug 23;36:102152. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.102152. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of biosimilars of bevacizumab in näive patients with diabetic macular edema.
Indian J Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 1;56(4):248-252. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_58_24. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
8
Anti-VEGF therapy for the long-term management of diabetic macular edema: a treat-to-target strategy based on macular morphology.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec;262(12):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06558-y. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
9
Aflibercept or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;13(1):16-26. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1490. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验