Tantawi Diya, Eberlin Seth, Calvert Jay
US Department of the Army, Beaumont Medical Center, Special Operations Task Force, 8th Medical Brigade, Michigan.
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clin Plast Surg. 2015 Jan;42(1):123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2014.09.005.
The midface has suffered vigorous challenges in terms of rejuvenation techniques over the years. A variety of alternatives are available for facial skeletal and soft tissue volume enhancement. No technique is ideal in every patient. After a thorough facial analysis, the surgeon must consider the advantages and disadvantages of implant-based volume enhancement in the context of each individual patient to determine the most appropriate option. Computer modeling provides improved methods to assess volumetric changes to augment and restore the facial volume. It is our belief that the multiple planes of dissection offered by the midface also allow us to redrape the soft tissues 3-dimensionally and continue to offer the consistency and longevity with implant-based midface rejuvenation.
多年来,中面部在年轻化技术方面面临着严峻挑战。面部骨骼和软组织容量增加有多种选择。没有一种技术对每个患者都是理想的。经过全面的面部分析后,外科医生必须根据每个患者的具体情况考虑基于植入物的容量增加的优缺点,以确定最合适的方案。计算机建模提供了改进的方法来评估体积变化,以增加和恢复面部容量。我们认为,中面部提供的多个解剖平面也使我们能够三维地重新覆盖软组织,并继续为基于植入物的中面部年轻化提供一致性和持久性。