• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奖励不确定性下的动机显著性归因:一种巴甫洛夫模型。

Incentive salience attribution under reward uncertainty: A Pavlovian model.

作者信息

Anselme Patrick

机构信息

Département de Psychologie, Cognition & Comportement, Université de Liège, 5 Boulevard du Rectorat (B 32), B 4000 Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2015 Feb;111:6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.016
PMID:25444780
Abstract

There is a vast literature on the behavioural effects of partial reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning. Compared with animals receiving continuous reinforcement, partially rewarded animals typically show (a) a slower development of the conditioned response (CR) early in training and (b) a higher asymptotic level of the CR later in training. This phenomenon is known as the partial reinforcement acquisition effect (PRAE). Learning models of Pavlovian conditioning fail to account for it. In accordance with the incentive salience hypothesis, it is here argued that incentive motivation (or 'wanting') plays a more direct role in controlling behaviour than does learning, and reward uncertainty is shown to have an excitatory effect on incentive motivation. The psychological origin of that effect is discussed and a computational model integrating this new interpretation is developed. Many features of CRs under partial reinforcement emerge from this model.

摘要

关于巴甫洛夫条件反射中部分强化的行为效应,已有大量文献。与接受连续强化的动物相比,部分获得奖励的动物通常表现出:(a)在训练早期条件反应(CR)的发展较慢;(b)在训练后期CR的渐近水平较高。这种现象被称为部分强化习得效应(PRAE)。巴甫洛夫条件反射的学习模型无法对此作出解释。根据动机显著性假说,本文认为动机激励(或“欲求”)在控制行为方面比学习发挥着更直接的作用,并且奖励不确定性对动机激励具有兴奋作用。本文讨论了该效应的心理起源,并开发了一个整合这种新解释的计算模型。部分强化下CR的许多特征都源自该模型。

相似文献

1
Incentive salience attribution under reward uncertainty: A Pavlovian model.奖励不确定性下的动机显著性归因:一种巴甫洛夫模型。
Behav Processes. 2015 Feb;111:6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
2
Elucidating the role of D4 receptors in mediating attributions of salience to incentive stimuli on Pavlovian conditioned approach and conditioned reinforcement paradigms.阐明D4受体在介导巴甫洛夫条件性趋近和条件性强化范式中对激励刺激的显著性归因方面的作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Oct 1;312:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
3
The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.关于多巴胺在奖赏中作用的争论:动机显著性的实例
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):391-431. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
4
Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.巴甫洛夫式奖励预测中的初始不确定性会持续提高动机显著性,并将信号追踪扩展到通常没有吸引力的线索上。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Jun 1;266:119-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
Motivational control of sign-tracking behaviour: A theoretical framework.符号追踪行为的动机控制:一个理论框架。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jun;65:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Evidence for motivational enhancement of sign-tracking behavior under reward uncertainty.奖励不确定性下信号追踪行为动机增强的证据。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):350-355. doi: 10.1037/xan0000213. Epub 2019 May 13.
7
A neural computational model of incentive salience.一种动机显著性的神经计算模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000437. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
8
Ablation of NMDA receptors in dopamine neurons disrupts attribution of incentive salience to reward-paired stimuli.多巴胺能神经元中NMDA受体的消融破坏了对奖励配对刺激的动机显著性归因。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 May 2;363:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.037. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
The influence of subthalamic nucleus lesions on sign-tracking to stimuli paired with food and drug rewards: facilitation of incentive salience attribution?丘脑底核损伤对与食物和药物奖励配对的刺激的信号追踪的影响:促进动机显著性归因?
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Sep;33(10):2352-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301653. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
10
Reward uncertainty enhances incentive salience attribution as sign-tracking.奖励不确定性增强激励显著性归因作为标记追踪。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Feb 1;238:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
"Wanting" versus "needing" related value: An fMRI meta-analysis.“想要”与“需要”相关价值:一项 fMRI 元分析。
Brain Behav. 2022 Sep;12(9):e32713. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2713. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
2
The Straw That Broke the Camel's Back: Natural Variations in 17β-Estradiol and COMT-Val158Met Genotype Interact in the Modulation of Model-Free and Model-Based Control.压垮骆驼背的最后一根稻草:17β-雌二醇的自然变异与儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶基因缬氨酸158蛋氨酸(COMT-Val158Met)基因型在无模型和基于模型的控制调节中相互作用。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jul 8;15:658769. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.658769. eCollection 2021.
3
Dissociable dopaminergic and pavlovian influences in goal-trackers and sign-trackers on a model of compulsive checking in OCD.
在强迫症强迫检查模型中,目标追踪者和线索追踪者的多巴胺能和巴甫洛夫影响可分离。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Dec;237(12):3569-3581. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05636-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
4
Impacts of inter-trial interval duration on a computational model of sign-tracking vs. goal-tracking behaviour.试验间间隔时长对标志追踪与目标追踪行为的计算模型的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Aug;236(8):2373-2388. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05323-y. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
The role of 'jackpot' stimuli in maladaptive decision-making: dissociable effects of D1/D2 receptor agonists and antagonists.“ jackpot ” 刺激在适应不良决策中的作用:D1/D2 受体激动剂和拮抗剂的可分离效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 May;235(5):1427-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4851-6. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
6
Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.大鼠的次优选择:动机显著性归因促进适应不良的决策。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
7
The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core.食物线索的感官特征会影响其作为激励刺激物并在伏隔核核心区域诱发多巴胺释放的能力。
Learn Mem. 2016 Oct 17;23(11):595-606. doi: 10.1101/lm.043026.116. Print 2016 Nov.
8
Age differences in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and extinction in rats.大鼠食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反射及消退中的年龄差异
Physiol Behav. 2016 Dec 1;167:354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
9
The origins of individual differences in how learning is expressed in rats: A general-process perspective.大鼠学习表现个体差异的起源:一种通用过程视角。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(4):313-324. doi: 10.1037/xan0000116.
10
Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction.出现信号追踪行为的大鼠对巴甫洛夫式消退具有抗性,但对工具性消退则不然。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 1;296:418-430. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.055. Epub 2015 Jul 30.