Department of Anesthesiology, ShuGuang Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine University, Shanghai 201203, PR China.
Department of Anesthesiology, ShuGuang Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine University, Shanghai 201203, PR China.
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1484-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
A parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate the effect of combining the interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) with Intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia to isolated Intravenous-inhalation anesthesia in the upper extremity fractures surgery of elderly patients.
One hundred elderly patients who underwent upper extremity surgery were randomly assigned to received isolated Intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia (group CI, n = 50) and IBPB associated with Intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia (group NB, n = 50). Associated side effects, recovery time after operation, as well as the dose of intraoperative vasoactive agents and auxiliary drugs were noted.
The two groups were not significantly different in gender (P = 0.539), ages (P = 0.683) and weight (P = 0.212). Five patients (10%) in the group NB and 17 patients (34%) in the group CI suffered from preoperative hypotension (P = 0.004). Besides, lower incidence of other adverse effects such as mental stress, incision pain and hypertension were also found in the group NB; however, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The consumption of general anesthetics in the group NB was significantly less than that of the group CI (propofol, P = 0.004; lsoflurane, P < 0.001), and the recovery time of the group NB was significantly shorter than that of the group CI (P = 0.020).
Combining IBPB with Intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia in elderly patients hold a greater potential for upper extremity fractures surgery due to its improved clinical effectiveness and fewer side effects.
一项平行组随机对照试验(RCT)评估了将肌间沟臂丛阻滞(IBPB)与静脉吸入复合麻醉联合应用于老年患者上肢骨折手术中,与单独静脉吸入复合麻醉相比的效果。
100 例拟行上肢手术的老年患者随机分为单独静脉吸入复合麻醉组(CI 组,n=50)和 IBPB 联合静脉吸入复合麻醉组(NB 组,n=50)。记录相关的副作用、术后恢复时间,以及术中血管活性药物和辅助药物的剂量。
两组患者在性别(P=0.539)、年龄(P=0.683)和体重(P=0.212)方面无显著差异。NB 组 5 例(10%)和 CI 组 17 例(34%)患者术前发生低血压(P=0.004)。此外,NB 组患者出现精神紧张、切口疼痛和高血压等其他不良反应的发生率较低,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。NB 组全身麻醉药物的用量明显少于 CI 组(丙泊酚,P=0.004;异氟醚,P<0.001),NB 组的恢复时间明显短于 CI 组(P=0.020)。
与单独静脉吸入复合麻醉相比,IBPB 联合静脉吸入复合麻醉在老年患者上肢骨折手术中具有更好的临床效果和更少的副作用。