Wells Nancy M, Myers Beth M, Henderson Charles R
Department of Design & Environmental Analysis, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Department of Design & Environmental Analysis, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69 Suppl 1:S27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
This study examines effects of a school garden intervention on elementary school children's physical activity (PA).
Twelve schools in New York were randomly assigned to receive the school garden intervention (n=6) or to the waitlist control group that later received gardens (n=6). PA was measured by self-report survey (Girls Health Enrichment Multi-site Study Activity Questionnaire) (N=227) and accelerometry (N=124, 8 schools) at baseline (Fall 2011) and follow-up (Spring 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013). Direct observation (N=117, 4 schools) was employed to compare indoor (classroom) and outdoor (garden) PA. Analysis was by general linear mixed models.
Survey data indicate garden intervention children's reports of usual sedentary activity decreased from pre-garden baseline to post-garden more than the control group children's (Δ=-.19, p=.001). Accelerometry data reveal that during the school day, children in the garden intervention showed a greater increase in percent of time spent in moderate and moderate-to-vigorous PA from baseline to follow-up than the control group children (Δ=+.58, p=.010; Δ=+1.0, p=.044). Direct observation within-group comparison of children at schools with gardens revealed that children move more and sit less during an outdoor garden-based lesson than during an indoor, classroom-based lesson.
School gardens show some promise to promote children's PA.
clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02148315.
本研究探讨学校花园干预对小学生身体活动(PA)的影响。
纽约的12所学校被随机分配接受学校花园干预(n = 6)或进入等待名单对照组(n = 6),后者随后也会拥有花园。在基线期(2011年秋季)和随访期(2012年春季、2012年秋季、2013年春季),通过自我报告调查(女孩健康强化多地点研究活动问卷)(N = 227)和加速度计测量(N = 124,8所学校)来测量身体活动。采用直接观察法(N = 117,4所学校)比较室内(教室)和室外(花园)的身体活动。分析采用一般线性混合模型。
调查数据表明,与对照组儿童相比,接受花园干预的儿童报告的日常久坐活动从花园干预前的基线期到干预后的减少幅度更大(Δ = -0.19,p = 0.001)。加速度计数据显示,在学校日期间,与对照组儿童相比,接受花园干预的儿童从基线期到随访期,中度和中等到剧烈身体活动的时间百分比增加幅度更大(Δ = +0.58,p = 0.010;Δ = +1.0,p = 0.044)。对设有花园的学校的儿童进行的组内直接观察比较显示,与室内基于教室的课程相比,儿童在室外基于花园的课程中活动更多、久坐更少。
学校花园在促进儿童身体活动方面显示出一定前景。
clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02148315