Callan Aoife, O'Shea Eamon
Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
An ageing population provokes an economic interest in the resource allocation questions posed by long-term care and critically, the development of sustainable community-based health and social care models that support independent living. This paper explores Irish citizens preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for a range of community-based care programmes, including different telecare programmes that support older people to continue living at home. The paper reports on a cross-sectional multi-good contingent valuation survey conducted between April and September 2009 with three representative samples of the Irish population (N = 1214) to identify rankings and preferences for different community care programmes including: family care programme, a state-provided care programme and three different telecare programmes. The survey design permits the identification of strength, direction and relative preferences of different forms of community care provision. We also investigate convergent validity between ranking and willingness to pay results. We find that while people place significant value on formal state care provision and on telecare programmes, willingness to pay (WTP) estimates continue to highlight the importance of family care, which remains the strongest preference of the Irish population for the provision of community-based care for older people in the country. Respondents weakened their ranking preferences in the WTP exercise. However, both the direction of ranking and WTP estimates confirm the importance of family care. While all telecare programmes generated some economic value, telecare associated with social connection had much stronger support than telecare used to support physical or cognitive care needs. This paper offers unique information on societal values for different forms of community care provision, and in particular, the direction of preferences for technology-based approaches.
人口老龄化引发了人们对长期护理所带来的资源分配问题的经济关注,至关重要的是,引发了对支持独立生活的可持续社区健康和社会护理模式发展的关注。本文探讨了爱尔兰公民对一系列社区护理项目的偏好和支付意愿(WTP),包括不同的远程护理项目,这些项目支持老年人继续在家生活。本文报告了2009年4月至9月期间对爱尔兰人口的三个代表性样本(N = 1214)进行的横断面多物品条件价值评估调查,以确定不同社区护理项目的排名和偏好,这些项目包括:家庭护理项目、国家提供的护理项目以及三个不同的远程护理项目。该调查设计允许识别不同形式社区护理提供的强度、方向和相对偏好。我们还研究了排名结果和支付意愿结果之间的收敛效度。我们发现,虽然人们非常重视国家正式护理提供和远程护理项目,但支付意愿(WTP)估计值继续凸显家庭护理的重要性,家庭护理仍然是爱尔兰人口为该国老年人提供社区护理的最强偏好。在支付意愿调查中,受访者弱化了他们的排名偏好。然而,排名方向和支付意愿估计值都证实了家庭护理的重要性。虽然所有远程护理项目都产生了一定的经济价值,但与社会联系相关的远程护理比用于支持身体或认知护理需求的远程护理获得了更强的支持。本文提供了关于不同形式社区护理提供的社会价值的独特信息,特别是对基于技术的方法的偏好方向。