Jeong Seong Hyun, Moon Joon Ho, Kim Jin Seok, Yang Deok-Hwan, Park Yong, Cho Seok Goo, Kwak Jae-Yong, Eom Hyeon Seok, Won Jong Ho, Hong Jun Shik, Oh Sung Yong, Lee Ho Sup, Kim Seok Jin
Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
Ann Hematol. 2015 Apr;94(4):617-25. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2258-y. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
The hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) regimen has been widely used for lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) as a primary treatment. However, there is few data about its treatment outcome in Asian patients. Thus, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of hyper-CVAD induction and stem cell transplantation (SCT) consolidation in LBL patients. The treatment responses of 49 patients treated with the hyper-CVAD regimen were retrospectively analyzed in 13 institutions. Given 24 patients who responded to hyper-CVAD underwent consolidation treatment with SCT, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received SCT were compared with patients who did not. The overall response rate was 79 %: 73 % (36/49) complete responses, 6 % (3/49) partial responses, and 4 % (2/49) induction deaths. The major limitation for the delivery of the planned hyper-CVAD cycles was hematological toxicity. Among 39 responders, 24 patients underwent autologous (n = 16) and allogeneic SCT (n = 8) consolidation. Their 3-year OS and PFS rates were 76 and 78 %, respectively, and there was no difference in survival outcomes between autologous and allogeneic SCT. However, 15 patients without SCT consolidation showed poorer PFS even though they all achieved complete response. Thus, only seven patients maintained their response at the time of analysis. In conclusion, the hyper-CVAD regimen is effective for remission induction in LBL, and SCT consolidation after hyper-CVAD induction produced better clinical outcomes than did continuation of hyper-CVAD.
超分割环磷酰胺、长春新碱、阿霉素和地塞米松(hyper-CVAD)方案已被广泛用作淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(LBL)的一线治疗方案。然而,关于其在亚洲患者中的治疗结果的数据较少。因此,我们开展了这项研究,以评估hyper-CVAD诱导治疗及干细胞移植(SCT)巩固治疗在LBL患者中的疗效。对13家机构中接受hyper-CVAD方案治疗的49例患者的治疗反应进行了回顾性分析。鉴于24例对hyper-CVAD有反应的患者接受了SCT巩固治疗,将接受SCT的患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)与未接受SCT的患者进行了比较。总缓解率为79%:完全缓解率为73%(36/49),部分缓解率为6%(3/49),诱导期死亡率为4%(2/49)。计划的hyper-CVAD疗程实施的主要限制因素是血液学毒性。在39例缓解者中,24例患者接受了自体(n = 16)和异基因SCT(n = 8)巩固治疗。他们的3年OS率和PFS率分别为76%和78%,自体和异基因SCT的生存结果无差异。然而,15例未接受SCT巩固治疗的患者尽管均达到完全缓解,但其PFS较差。因此,在分析时只有7例患者维持缓解。总之,hyper-CVAD方案对LBL的缓解诱导有效,hyper-CVAD诱导后进行SCT巩固治疗比继续使用hyper-CVAD产生了更好的临床结果。