Rolf Andreas, Rixe Johannes, Kim Won K, Börgel Johannes, Möllmann Helge, Nef Holger M, Liebetrau Christoph, Kramm Thorsten, Guth Stefan, Krombach Gabriele A, Mayer Eckhard, Hamm Christian W
Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Benekestrasse 2-8, Bad Nauheim 61231, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Dec 5;16(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12968-014-0096-7.
The aim of the study was to characterize RV adaptation to varying loading conditions in patients with chronic thromboembolic hypertension (CTEPH) before and after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Nearly 4% of patients with pulmonary embolism develop CTEPH. PEA offers a cure with excellent outcome. By use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) combined with hemodynamic measurements pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea-pulm_i), end-systolic right ventricular elastance (Ees-RV_i) and ventriculo-arterial coupling (Ea-pulm_i/Ees-RV_i) can be studied before and after PEA.
Sixty-five patients (mean age 41±12 years, 28 female) underwent CMR pre- and post-PEA. Ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic (EDVi), end-systolic (ESVi), and stroke (SVi) volumes were indexed for body surface area. Ea-pulm_i was calculated as pulmonary artery mean pressure (mPAP)/SVi, and Ees-RV_i as mPAP/ESVi.
mPAP decreased from 47±12 to 25±9 mmHg, p=0.0001. Ea-pulm_i was increased before PEA and normalized afterwards (2.8±2.1 vs. 0.85±0.4 mmHg/ml/m2, p=0.0001). Ees-RV_i was depressed before and after PEA (0.72±0.27 vs. 0.66±0.3 mmHg/ml/m2, p=0.13). EF improved from 25±12% to 46±10%, p=0.0001, because ventriculo-arterial coupling was restored (4.2±3 vs. 1.4±0.6, p=0.0001). EDVi and ESVi mproved significantly (EDVi 92±32 to 72±23 ml, p=0.0001; ESVi 69±31 to 41±18 ml, p=0.0001).
RV function is largely determined by afterload and returns to normal once afterload is normalized. This is paralleled by a significant improvement of CMR indices of right ventricular remodelling.
本研究旨在描述慢性血栓栓塞性高血压(CTEPH)患者在肺动脉内膜剥脱术(PEA)前后右心室(RV)对不同负荷条件的适应性变化。近4%的肺栓塞患者会发展为CTEPH。PEA可实现治愈且预后良好。通过使用心血管磁共振(CMR)结合血流动力学测量,可在PEA前后研究肺动脉弹性(Ea-pulm_i)、收缩末期右心室弹性(Ees-RV_i)和心室-动脉耦合(Ea-pulm_i/Ees-RV_i)。
65例患者(平均年龄41±12岁,28例女性)在PEA前后接受了CMR检查。射血分数(EF)、舒张末期容积(EDVi)、收缩末期容积(ESVi)和每搏输出量(SVi)均根据体表面积进行校正。Ea-pulm_i计算为肺动脉平均压(mPAP)/SVi,Ees-RV_i计算为mPAP/ESVi。
mPAP从47±12 mmHg降至25±9 mmHg,p = 0.0001。Ea-pulm_i在PEA前升高,术后恢复正常(2.8±2.1 vs. 0.85±0.4 mmHg/ml/m2,p = 0.0001)。Ees-RV_i在PEA前后均降低(0.72±0.27 vs. 0.66±0.3 mmHg/ml/m2,p = 0.13)。EF从25±12%提高到46±10%,p = 0.0001,这是因为心室-动脉耦合得以恢复(4.2±3 vs. 1.4±0.6,p = 0.0001)。EDVi和ESVi显著改善(EDVi从92±32 ml降至72±23 ml,p = 0.0001;ESVi从69±31 ml降至41±18 ml,p = 0.0001)。
RV功能在很大程度上由后负荷决定,一旦后负荷恢复正常,RV功能也会恢复正常。与此同时,右心室重构的CMR指标也有显著改善。