Suppr超能文献

欧洲视角下的辅助技术服务提供系统——拉脱维亚与瑞典之间的异同

A European perspective on the service delivery systems for assistive technology--differences and similarities between Latvia and Sweden.

作者信息

Kylberg Marianne, Löfqvist Charlotte, Tomsone Signe, Phillips Judith, Liepina Zane, Iwarsson Susanne

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden,

出版信息

J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2015 Mar;30(1):51-67. doi: 10.1007/s10823-014-9255-4.

Abstract

National laws and regulations on service delivery systems (SDS) for assistive technology (AT) in Europe aim to support the activity and participation of people with disabilities. The aim of this paper was to study similarities and differences in the SDS for AT of one Eastern and one Western EU member state. The legislation and regulations, and their operationalization were described from the perspective of key actors, with a focus on the ageing population. Semi-structured interviews (N = 14) were conducted in Sweden and Latvia. The informants had various professional backgrounds and organizational roles, and represented different areas of work. Similarities found were connected to legislation and policy, the aim of AT provision, the growth of a private sector and how financial resources affect the SDS. Differences were related to the availability of AT, and to how, and for and by whom the devices were provided, with Latvia prioritizing certain groups over others and excluding older people. In Latvia, despite it not being stated in the legislation, a medical perspective on AT provision was applied, whereas in Sweden, in congruence with the legislation, the perspective was explicitly biopsychosocial. Despite similarities on the legislation and policy level, interpreted based on the perceptions of professionals there are marked differences between Latvia and Sweden in the operationalization of the SDS of AT. To support activity and participation for the ageing population, the services connected to AT need to be carefully thought out and executed, making efficient use of financial resources and professional competencies.

摘要

欧洲关于辅助技术(AT)服务提供系统(SDS)的国家法律法规旨在支持残疾人的活动和参与。本文的目的是研究一个东欧和一个西欧欧盟成员国在辅助技术服务提供系统方面的异同。从关键行为者的角度描述了法律法规及其实施情况,重点关注老年人口。在瑞典和拉脱维亚进行了半结构化访谈(N = 14)。受访者具有不同的专业背景和组织角色,代表不同的工作领域。发现的相似之处与立法和政策、辅助技术提供的目标、私营部门的发展以及财政资源如何影响服务提供系统有关。差异与辅助技术的可用性、设备的提供方式、对象以及提供者有关,拉脱维亚将某些群体置于优先地位,而将老年人排除在外。在拉脱维亚,尽管立法中未明确规定,但在辅助技术提供方面采用了医学视角,而在瑞典,与立法一致,视角明确是生物心理社会的。尽管在立法和政策层面存在相似之处,但根据专业人员的看法来解释,拉脱维亚和瑞典在辅助技术服务提供系统的实施方面存在显著差异。为了支持老年人口的活动和参与,与辅助技术相关的服务需要经过精心规划和执行,有效利用财政资源和专业能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验