Baldota Institute of Digestive Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb;81(2):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative rescue method in patients with failed ERCP. Opportunities for teaching and training are limited because of a low case volume at most centers.
To evaluate a stereolithography/3-dimensional (3D) printing bile duct prototype for teaching and training in EUS-BD.
Prospective observational feasibility study.
Tertiary referral center.
Twenty endosonographers attending an interventional EUS workshop.
A prototype of a dilated biliary system was prepared by computer-aided design and 3D printing. The study participants performed guidewire manipulation and EUS-BD procedures (antegrade procedure and/or choledochoduodenostomy) on the prototype. Participants were scored with the device on a scale of 1 to 5 via a questionnaire. Participants' success rate for various steps of the EUS-BD procedure was noted.
Subjective and objective evaluation of the prototype regarding its overall applicability, quality of radiographic and EUS images, and 4 steps of EUS-BD procedure (needle puncture, guidewire manipulation, tract dilation, stent placement).
Fifteen participants returned the questionnaire, and 10 completed all 4 steps of EUS-BD. The median score for overall utility was 4, whereas that for EUS and US views was 5. Participants with experience in performing more than 20 EUS-BD procedures scored the prototype significantly lower for stent placement (P = .013) and equivalent for needle puncture, tract dilation, and wire manipulation. The success rate of various steps was 100% for needle puncture and tract dilation, 82.35% for wire manipulation, and 80% for stent placement. The mean overall procedure time was 18 minutes.
Small number of participants.
The 3D printing bile duct prototype appears suitable for teaching of and training in the various steps of EUS-BD. Further studies are required to elucidate its role.
EUS 引导下的胆道引流术(EUS-BD)已成为 ERCP 失败患者的一种替代救援方法。由于大多数中心的病例数量较少,因此教学和培训的机会有限。
评估用于 EUS-BD 教学和培训的立体光刻/三维(3D)打印胆管模型。
前瞻性观察可行性研究。
三级转诊中心。
参加介入性 EUS 研讨会的 20 名超声内镜医师。
通过计算机辅助设计和 3D 打印制备扩张胆管系统的原型。研究参与者在原型上进行导丝操作和 EUS-BD 程序(逆行程序和/或胆管十二指肠吻合术)。参与者通过问卷对该设备进行 1 到 5 的评分。记录参与者进行 EUS-BD 程序各个步骤的成功率。
原型在整体适用性、放射和 EUS 图像质量以及 EUS-BD 程序的 4 个步骤(针穿刺、导丝操作、通道扩张、支架放置)方面的主观和客观评估。
15 名参与者返回了问卷,其中 10 名参与者完成了 EUS-BD 的所有 4 个步骤。总体效用的中位数评分为 4,而 EUS 和 US 视图的评分为 5。进行超过 20 次 EUS-BD 操作经验的参与者对支架放置的评分明显较低(P=.013),而针穿刺、通道扩张和导丝操作的评分相当。各个步骤的成功率均为 100%(针穿刺和通道扩张)、82.35%(导丝操作)和 80%(支架放置)。总体手术时间的平均值为 18 分钟。
参与者人数较少。
3D 打印胆管模型似乎适合于 EUS-BD 各个步骤的教学和培训。需要进一步的研究来阐明其作用。