Tugnoli Gregorio, Bianchi Elisa, Biscardi Andrea, Coniglio Carlo, Isceri Salvatore, Simonetti Luigi, Gordini Giovanni, Di Saverio Salomone
Trauma Surgery Unit, Department of Emergency, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna Local Health District, Bologna, Italy.
Trauma ICU, Trauma Center, Department of Emergency, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna Local Health District, Bologna, Italy.
Surg Today. 2015 Oct;45(10):1210-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1084-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
Non-operative management (NOM) of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI) is the standard of care, although it is associated with a potential risk of failure. Hemodynamically unstable patients should always undergo immediate surgery and avoid unnecessary CT scans. Angioembolization might help to increase the NOM rates, as well as NOM success rates. The aim of this study was to review and critically analyze the data from BSI cases managed at the Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center during the past 5 years, with a focus on NOM, its success rates and outcomes. A further aim was to develop a proposed clinical practical algorithm for the management of BSI derived from Clinical Audit experience. During the period between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013 we managed 293 patients with splenic lesions at the Trauma Center of Maggiore Hospital of Bologna. The data analyzed included the demographics, clinical parameters and characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic data, as well as the outcomes and follow-up data. A retrospective evaluation of the clinical outcomes through a clinical audit has been used to design a practical clinical algorithm. During the five-year period, 293 patients with BSI were admitted, 77 of whom underwent immediate surgical management. The majority (216) of the patients was initially managed non-operatively and 207 of these patients experienced a successful NOM, with an overall rate of successful NOM of 70 % among all BSI cases. The success rate of NOM was 95.8 % in this series. All patients presenting with stable hemodynamics underwent an immediate CT-scan; angiography with embolization was performed in 54 cases for active contrast extravasation or in cases with grade V lesions even in absence of active bleeding. Proximal embolization was preferentially used for high-grade injuries. After a critical review of the cases treated during the past 5 years during a monthly clinical audit meeting, a clinical algorithm has been developed with the aim of standardizing the clinical management of BSI by a multidisciplinary team to include every patient within the correct diagnostic and therapeutic pathway, in order to improve the outcomes by potentially decreasing the NOM failure rates and to optimize the utilization of resources.
对于血流动力学稳定的钝性脾损伤(BSI)患者,非手术治疗(NOM)是标准治疗方法,尽管其存在潜在的失败风险。血流动力学不稳定的患者应始终立即接受手术,并避免不必要的CT扫描。血管栓塞术可能有助于提高非手术治疗的比例以及非手术治疗的成功率。本研究的目的是回顾并批判性地分析过去5年在马焦雷医院创伤中心接受治疗的BSI病例数据,重点关注非手术治疗、其成功率及结果。另一个目的是根据临床审计经验制定一套关于BSI治疗的临床实用算法。在2009年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间,我们在博洛尼亚马焦雷医院创伤中心治疗了293例脾损伤患者。分析的数据包括人口统计学、临床参数和特征、诊断和治疗数据以及结果和随访数据。通过临床审计对临床结果进行回顾性评估,以设计出实用的临床算法。在这五年期间,共收治293例BSI患者,其中77例立即接受了手术治疗。大多数患者(216例)最初采用非手术治疗,其中207例非手术治疗成功,在所有BSI病例中,非手术治疗的总体成功率为70%。本系列中非手术治疗的成功率为95.8%。所有血流动力学稳定的患者均立即接受了CT扫描;54例因有活动性造影剂外渗或存在Ⅴ级损伤(即使无活动性出血)而进行了血管造影及栓塞术。对于高级别损伤,优先采用近端栓塞术。在每月一次的临床审计会议上对过去5年治疗的病例进行严格审查后,制定了一种临床算法,旨在规范多学科团队对BSI的临床管理,使每位患者都能进入正确的诊断和治疗路径,从而通过可能降低非手术治疗失败率来改善治疗结果,并优化资源利用。