Guy Alexa, Seaton Sarah E, Boyle Elaine M, Draper Elizabeth S, Field David J, Manktelow Bradley N, Marlow Neil, Smith Lucy K, Johnson Samantha
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; School of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
J Pediatr. 2015 Feb;166(2):269-75.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.10.053. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
To assess the prevalence of positive screens using the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) questionnaire and follow-up interview in late and moderately preterm (LMPT; 32-36 weeks) infants and term-born controls.
Population-based prospective cohort study of 1130 LMPT and 1255 term-born infants. Parents completed the M-CHAT questionnaire at 2-years corrected age. Parents of infants with positive questionnaire screens were followed up with a telephone interview to clarify failed items. The M-CHAT questionnaire was re-scored, and infants were classified as true or false positives. Neurosensory, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes were assessed using parent report.
Parents of 634 (57%) LMPT and 761 (62%) term-born infants completed the M-CHAT questionnaire. LMPT infants had significantly higher risk of a positive questionnaire screen compared with controls (14.5% vs 9.2%; relative risk [RR] 1.58; 95% CI 1.18, 2.11). After follow-up, significantly more LMPT infants than controls had a true positive screen (2.4% vs 0.5%; RR 4.52; 1.51, 13.56). This remained significant after excluding infants with neurosensory impairments (2.0% vs 0.5%; RR 3.67; 1.19, 11.3).
LMPT infants are at significantly increased risk for positive autistic screen. An M-CHAT follow-up interview is essential as screening for autism spectrum disorders is especially confounded in preterm populations. Infants with false positive screens are at risk for cognitive and behavioral problems.
使用改良版幼儿自闭症检查表(M-CHAT)问卷及后续访谈,评估晚期和中度早产(LMPT;32 - 36周)婴儿及足月儿对照组中筛查阳性的患病率。
基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,纳入1130名LMPT婴儿和1255名足月儿。父母在矫正年龄2岁时完成M-CHAT问卷。问卷筛查阳性的婴儿父母接受电话访谈以明确未通过项目。对M-CHAT问卷重新计分,将婴儿分类为真阳性或假阳性。使用家长报告评估神经感觉、认知和行为结局。
634名(57%)LMPT婴儿和761名(62%)足月儿的父母完成了M-CHAT问卷。与对照组相比,LMPT婴儿问卷筛查阳性风险显著更高(14.5%对9.2%;相对风险[RR]1.58;95%可信区间1.18,2.11)。随访后,LMPT婴儿真阳性筛查的比例显著高于对照组(2.4%对0.5%;RR 4.52;1.51,13.56)。排除有神经感觉障碍的婴儿后,这一差异仍显著(2.0%对0.5%;RR 3.67;1.19,11.3)。
LMPT婴儿自闭症筛查阳性风险显著增加。由于自闭症谱系障碍筛查在早产人群中特别容易混淆,因此M-CHAT后续访谈至关重要。筛查假阳性的婴儿有认知和行为问题的风险。