Dickey Michael Walsh, Warren Tessa
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, United States; Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;67:63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
Event-related conceptual knowledge outside the language system rapidly affects verb-argument processing in unimpaired adults (McRae and Matsuki, 2009). Some have argued that verb-argument processing is in fact reducible to the activation of such event-related knowledge. However, data favoring this conclusion have come primarily from college-aged healthy adults, for whom both linguistic and conceptual semantic processing is fast and automatic. This study examined the influence of event-related knowledge on verb-argument processing among adults with aphasia (n = 8) and older unimpaired controls (n = 60), in two self-paced reading studies. Participants read sentences containing a plausible verb-argument combination (Mary used a knife to chop the large carrots before dinner), a combination that violated event-related world knowledge (Mary used some bleach to clean the large carrots before dinner), or a combination that violated the verb's selectional restrictions (Mary used a pump to inflate the large carrots before dinner). The participants with aphasia naturally split into two groups: Group 1 (n = 4) had conceptual-semantic impairments (evidenced by poor performance on tasks like Pyramids & Palm Trees) but reasonably intact language processing (higher Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotients), while Group 2 (n = 4) had intact conceptual semantics but poorer language processing. Older unimpaired controls and aphasic Group 1 showed rapid on-line disruption for sentences with selectional-restriction violations (SRVs) and event-related knowledge violations, and also showed SRV-specific penalties in sentence-final acceptability judgments (Experiment 1) and comprehension questions (Experiment 2). In contrast, Group 2 showed very few reliable differences across conditions in either on-line or off-line measures. This difference between aphasic groups suggests that verb-related information and event-related knowledge may be dissociated in aphasia. Furthermore, it suggests that intact language processing is more critical for successful verb-argument integration than intact access to event-related world knowledge. This pattern is unexpected if verb-argument processing is reducible to activation of event-related conceptual knowledge.
语言系统之外与事件相关的概念性知识会迅速影响未受损成年人的动词-论元加工(麦克雷和松木,2009)。一些人认为,动词-论元加工实际上可归结为这种与事件相关知识的激活。然而,支持这一结论的数据主要来自大学年龄段的健康成年人,对他们来说,语言和概念语义加工都快速且自动。本研究通过两项自定步速阅读研究,考察了与事件相关知识对失语症成年人(n = 8)和未受损老年对照组(n = 60)动词-论元加工的影响。参与者阅读包含合理动词-论元组合的句子(玛丽在晚餐前用刀切碎大胡萝卜)、违反与事件相关的世界知识的组合(玛丽在晚餐前用一些漂白剂清洗大胡萝卜)或违反动词选择限制的组合(玛丽在晚餐前用泵给大胡萝卜充气)。失语症参与者自然分为两组:第1组(n = 4)有概念语义损伤(如在金字塔与棕榈树等任务中表现不佳可证明)但语言加工相对完整(西方失语症成套测验失语商数较高),而第2组(n = 4)有完整的概念语义但语言加工较差。未受损老年对照组和失语症第1组在违反选择限制(SRV)和与事件相关知识的句子上表现出快速的在线干扰,并且在句子末尾的可接受性判断(实验1)和理解问题(实验2)中也表现出特定于SRV的惩罚。相比之下,第2组在在线或离线测量的不同条件下几乎没有可靠的差异。失语症组之间的这种差异表明,在失语症中,与动词相关的信息和与事件相关的知识可能是分离的。此外,这表明完整的语言加工对于成功的动词-论元整合比完整地获取与事件相关的世界知识更为关键。如果动词-论元加工可归结为与事件相关的概念性知识的激活,那么这种模式是出乎意料的。