Suppr超能文献

外科随机对照试验的终止与未发表:观察性研究

Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study.

作者信息

Chapman Stephen J, Shelton Bryony, Mahmood Humza, Fitzgerald J Edward, Harrison Ewen M, Bhangu Aneel

机构信息

University of Leeds, School of Medicine, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2014 Dec 9;349:g6870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6870.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of early discontinuation and non-publication of randomised controlled trials involving patients undergoing surgery.

DESIGN

Cross sectional observational study of registered and published trials.

SETTING

Randomised controlled trials of interventions in patients undergoing a surgical procedure.

DATA SOURCES

The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for interventional trials registered between January 2008 and December 2009 using the keyword "surgery". Recruitment status was extracted from the ClinicalTrials.gov database. A systematic search for studies published in peer reviewed journals was performed; if they were not found, results posted on the ClinicalTrials.gov results database were sought. Email queries were sent to trial investigators of discontinued and unpublished completed trials if no reason for the respective status was disclosed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Trial discontinuation before completion and non-publication after completion. Logistic regression was used to determine the effect of funding source on publication status, with adjustment for intervention type and trial size.

RESULTS

Of 818 registered trials found using the keyword "surgery", 395 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 21% (81/395) were discontinued early, most commonly owing to poor recruitment (44%, 36/81). The remaining 314 (79%) trials proceeded to completion, with a publication rate of 66% (208/314) at a median time of 4.9 (interquartile range 4.0-6.0) years from study completion to publication search. A further 6% (20/314) of studies presented results on ClinicalTrials.gov without a corresponding peer reviewed publication. Industry funding did not affect the rate of discontinuation (adjusted odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 1.55) but was associated with a lower odds of publication for completed trials (0.43, 0.26 to 0.72). Investigators' email addresses for trials with an uncertain fate were identified for 71.4% (10/14) of discontinued trials and 83% (101/122) of unpublished studies. Only 43% (6/14) and 20% (25/122) replies were received. Email responses for completed trials indicated 11 trials in press, five published studies (four in non-indexed peer reviewed journals), and nine trials remaining unpublished.

CONCLUSIONS

One in five surgical randomised controlled trials are discontinued early, one in three completed trials remain unpublished, and investigators of unpublished studies are frequently not contactable. This represents a waste of research resources and raises ethical concerns regarding hidden clinical data and futile participation by patients with its attendant risks. To promote future efficiency and transparency, changes are proposed to research governance frameworks to overcome these concerns.

摘要

目的

确定涉及手术患者的随机对照试验的早期终止率和未发表率。

设计

对已注册和已发表试验的横断面观察性研究。

背景

针对接受外科手术患者的干预措施的随机对照试验。

数据来源

在ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中检索2008年1月至2009年12月期间使用关键词“手术”注册的干预性试验。从ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中提取招募状态。对同行评审期刊上发表的研究进行系统检索;若未找到,则查找ClinicalTrials.gov结果数据库中发布的结果。如果未披露各自状态的原因,则向已终止和未发表的已完成试验的研究者发送电子邮件询问。

主要观察指标

试验在完成前终止以及完成后未发表。采用逻辑回归确定资金来源对发表状态的影响,并对干预类型和试验规模进行调整。

结果

使用关键词“手术”检索到的818项注册试验中,395项符合纳入标准。其中,21%(81/395)提前终止,最常见的原因是招募困难(44%,36/81)。其余314项(79%)试验进行至完成,从研究完成到发表检索的中位时间为4.9年(四分位间距4.0 - 6.0),发表率为66%(208/314)。另有6%(20/314)的研究在ClinicalTrials.gov上公布了结果,但没有相应的同行评审发表文章。行业资助并未影响终止率(调整后的优势比为0.91,95%置信区间为0.54至1.55),但与已完成试验的发表几率较低相关(0.43,0.26至0.72)。对于命运不确定的试验,71.4%(10/14)的已终止试验和83%(101/122)的未发表研究确定了研究者的电子邮件地址。仅收到43%(6/14)和20%(25/122)的回复。已完成试验的电子邮件回复表明有11项正在审稿,5项已发表研究(4项发表在非索引同行评审期刊上),9项试验仍未发表。

结论

五分之一的外科随机对照试验提前终止,三分之一的已完成试验仍未发表,且未发表研究的研究者常常无法取得联系。这意味着研究资源的浪费,并引发了对隐藏临床数据以及患者徒劳参与及其伴随风险的伦理担忧。为提高未来的效率和透明度,建议对研究管理框架进行变革以克服这些担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac56/4793819/5097b9a4c958/chas020617.f1_default.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验