Suppr超能文献

在钝性腹部创伤的管理中,我们真的依赖快速诊断来进行决策吗?

Do we really rely on fast for decision-making in the management of blunt abdominal trauma?

作者信息

Carter Jeffrey W, Falco Mark H, Chopko Michael S, Flynn William J, Wiles Iii Charles E, Guo Weidun Alan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, United States.

Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, United States.

出版信息

Injury. 2015 May;46(5):817-21. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.023. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma examination (FAST) is currently taught and recommended in the ATLS(®), often as an addendum to the primary survey for patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Although it is non-invasive and rapidly performed at bedside, the utility of FAST in blunt abdominal trauma has been questioned. We designed this study to examine our hypothesis that FAST is not an efficacious screening tool for identifying intra-abdominal injuries.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with confirmatory diagnosis of blunt abdominal injuries with CT and/or laparotomy for a period of 1.5 years (from 7/2009 to 11/2010). FAST was performed by ED residents and considered positive when free intra-abdominal fluid was visualized. Abdominal CT, or exploratory laparotomy findings were used as confirmation of intra-abdominal injury.

RESULTS

A total of 1671 blunt trauma patients were admitted to and evaluated in the Emergency Department during a 1½ year period and 146 patients were confirmed intra-abdominal injuries by CT and/or laparotomy. Intraoperative findings include injuries to the liver, spleen, kidneys, and bowels. In 114 hemodynamically stable patients, FAST was positive in 25 patients, with a sensitivity of 22%. In 32 hemodynamically unstable patients, FAST was positive in 9 patients, with a sensitivity of 28%. A free peritoneal fluid and splenic injury are associated with a positive FAST on univariate analysis, and are the independent predictors for a positive FAST on multiple logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

FAST has a very low sensitivity in detecting blunt intraabdominal injury. In hemodynamically stable patients, a negative FAST without a CT may result in missed intra-abdominal injuries. In hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patients, with clear physical findings on examination, the decision for exploratory laparotomy should not be distracted by a negative FAST.

摘要

引言

创伤超声重点评估检查(FAST)目前在高级创伤生命支持(ATLS®)课程中讲授并被推荐,通常作为钝性腹部创伤患者初级评估的补充检查。尽管它是非侵入性的且可在床边快速完成,但FAST在钝性腹部创伤中的效用一直受到质疑。我们设计了本研究以检验我们的假设,即FAST并非识别腹腔内损伤的有效筛查工具。

方法

我们对1.5年期间(从2009年7月至2010年11月)所有经CT和/或剖腹手术确诊为钝性腹部损伤的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。FAST由急诊科住院医师进行,当观察到腹腔内游离液体时判定为阳性。腹部CT或剖腹探查结果用作腹腔内损伤的确诊依据。

结果

在1年半的时间里,共有1671例钝性创伤患者入住急诊科并接受评估,其中146例经CT和/或剖腹手术确诊为腹腔内损伤。术中发现包括肝脏、脾脏、肾脏和肠道损伤。在114例血流动力学稳定的患者中,25例FAST呈阳性,敏感性为22%。在32例血流动力学不稳定的患者中,9例FAST呈阳性,敏感性为28%。单因素分析显示,腹腔内游离液体和脾脏损伤与FAST阳性相关,且在多因素逻辑回归分析中是FAST阳性的独立预测因素。

结论

FAST在检测钝性腹腔内损伤方面敏感性非常低。在血流动力学稳定的患者中,FAST阴性且未行CT检查可能导致漏诊腹腔内损伤。在血流动力学不稳定的钝性创伤患者中,若体格检查有明确发现,不应因FAST阴性而干扰剖腹探查的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验