von Atzingen Augusto Castelli, Tiferes Dario Ariel, Deak Elizabeth, Matos Délcio, D'Ippolito Giuseppe
Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Division of Gastroenterology, Section of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Department of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Nov;69(11):723-30. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(11)03.
The purpose of our study was to report the results of the implementation of computed tomography colonography in a university hospital setting serving a Brazilian population at high risk of colorectal cancer.
After creating a computed tomography colonography service in our institution, 85 patients at high risk of colorectal cancer underwent computed tomography colonography followed by a same-day optical colonoscopy from September 2010 to May 2012. The overall accuracy of computed tomography colonography in the detection of lesions ≥6 mm was compared to that of optical colonoscopy (direct comparison). All colonic segments were evaluated using quality imaging (amount of liquid and solid residual feces and luminal distension). To assess patient acceptance and preference, a questionnaire was completed before and after the computed tomography colonography and optical colonoscopy. Fisher's exact test was used to measure the correlations between colonic distension, discomfort during the exam, exam preference and interpretation confidence.
Thirteen carcinomas and twenty-two lesions ≥6 mm were characterized. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of computed tomography colonography were 100%, 98.2% and 98.6%, respectively. Computed tomography colonography was the preferred method of investigation for 85% of patients. The preparation was reported to cause only mild discomfort for 97.6% of patients. According to the questionnaires, there was no significant relationship between colonic distension and discomfort (p>0.05). Most patients (89%) achieved excellent bowel preparation. There was a statistically significant correlation between the confidence perceived in reading the computed tomography colonography and the quality of the preparation in each colonic segment (p≤0.001). The average effective radiation dose per exam was 7.8 mSv.
It was possible to institute an efficient computed tomography colonography service at a university hospital that primarily assists patients from the public health system, with high accuracy, good acceptance and effective radiation doses. Our results seem to be comparable to other centers of excellence and fall within acceptable published guidelines, showing that a successful computed tomography colonography program can be reproduced in a South American population screened in a university hospital.
我们研究的目的是报告在一家为巴西结直肠癌高危人群服务的大学医院中实施计算机断层结肠成像(CT结肠成像)的结果。
在我们机构创建CT结肠成像服务后,从2010年9月至2012年5月,85例结直肠癌高危患者接受了CT结肠成像检查,随后在同一天进行了光学结肠镜检查。将CT结肠成像检测≥6mm病变的总体准确性与光学结肠镜检查的准确性进行比较(直接比较)。使用高质量成像(液体和固体残留粪便量以及肠腔扩张情况)对所有结肠段进行评估。为评估患者的接受度和偏好,在CT结肠成像和光学结肠镜检查前后完成了一份问卷。采用Fisher精确检验来衡量结肠扩张、检查期间的不适、检查偏好和解读信心之间的相关性。
共发现13例癌和22个≥6mm的病变。CT结肠成像的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100%、98.2%和98.6%。85%的患者将CT结肠成像作为首选的检查方法。据报告,97.6%的患者在准备过程中仅感到轻微不适。根据问卷,结肠扩张与不适之间无显著关系(p>0.05)。大多数患者(89%)的肠道准备效果极佳。在解读CT结肠成像时所感知的信心与每个结肠段的准备质量之间存在统计学显著相关性(p≤0.001)。每次检查的平均有效辐射剂量为7.8mSv。
在一家主要为公共卫生系统患者服务的大学医院中,能够建立高效的CT结肠成像服务,其具有高准确性、良好的接受度和有效的辐射剂量。我们的结果似乎与其他卓越中心相当,且符合已发表的可接受指南,表明在大学医院筛查的南美人群中可以重现成功的CT结肠成像项目。