Kim Eun Hye, Lee Yong Chan, Chang Young Woon, Park Jong-Jae, Chun Hoon Jai, Jung Hwoon-Yong, Kim Hyun-Soo, Jeong Hyun Yong, Seol Sang-Young, Han Sok Won, Choi Myung-Gyu, Park Soo-Heon, Lee Ok-Jae, Jung Jin Tae, Lee Dong Ho, Jung Hyun Chae, Lee Soo Teik, Kim Jae Gyu, Youn Sei Jin, Kim Hak Yang, Lee Sang Woo
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea,
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jun;60(6):1724-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3489-4. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
There has been no study on the efficacy of lafutidine for patients with reflux esophagitis in Korea.
To evaluate the efficacy of a new-generation histamine-2 receptor antagonist, lafutidine, in comparison with famotidine in patients with reflux esophagitis.
This was a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial enrolling patients with erosive esophagitis. The efficacy and safety of 20 mg lafutidine (treatment group) were compared with those of 40 mg famotidine (control group) and 20 mg omeprazole (reference group). The primary endpoint was the complete healing rates of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy after 8 weeks of treatment. The non-inferiority margin was assumed to be -15 %.
The healing rates of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy after 8 weeks of treatment were 70.14 % (101/144) in the lafutidine, 63.45 % (92/145) in the famotidine, and 85.71 % (126/147) in the omeprazole group. The difference in healing rates between the lafutidine and famotidine groups was 6.69 % (95 % confidence interval = [-4.14 to 17.52]). In addition, lafutidine was superior to famotidine in clinical improvement (53.73 % vs. 39.55 %, P = 0.0200).
Lafutidine was non-inferior to famotidine in healing of reflux esophagitis. Lafutidine, however, was superior to famotidine in terms of symptom relief of reflux esophagitis.
在韩国,尚未有关于拉呋替丁对反流性食管炎患者疗效的研究。
评估新一代组胺-2受体拮抗剂拉呋替丁与法莫替丁相比,对反流性食管炎患者的疗效。
这是一项纳入糜烂性食管炎患者的随机、双盲、非劣效性试验。将20毫克拉呋替丁(治疗组)的疗效和安全性与40毫克法莫替丁(对照组)和20毫克奥美拉唑(参照组)进行比较。主要终点是治疗8周后内镜检查时反流性食管炎的完全愈合率。非劣效性界值设定为-15%。
治疗8周后,拉呋替丁组内镜检查时反流性食管炎的愈合率为70.14%(101/144),法莫替丁组为63.45%(92/145),奥美拉唑组为85.71%(126/147)。拉呋替丁组与法莫替丁组愈合率的差异为6.69%(95%置信区间=[-4.14至17.52])。此外,拉呋替丁在临床改善方面优于法莫替丁(53.73%对39.55%,P = 0.0200)。
拉呋替丁在反流性食管炎愈合方面不劣于法莫替丁。然而,在反流性食管炎症状缓解方面,拉呋替丁优于法莫替丁。