Suppr超能文献

一种基于引文分布形状的新文献计量指标。

A new bibliometric index based on the shape of the citation distribution.

作者信息

Lando Tommaso, Bertoli-Barsotti Lucio

机构信息

Department of Finance, VŠB Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Dipartimento di Scienze aziendali, economiche e metodi quantitativi, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115962. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

In order to improve the h-index in terms of its accuracy and sensitivity to the form of the citation distribution, we propose the new bibliometric index [symbol in text]. The basic idea is to define, for any author with a given number of citations, an "ideal" citation distribution which represents a benchmark in terms of number of papers and number of citations per publication, and to obtain an index which increases its value when the real citation distribution approaches its ideal form. The method is very general because the ideal distribution can be defined differently according to the main objective of the index. In this paper we propose to define it by a "squared-form" distribution: this is consistent with many popular bibliometric indices, which reach their maximum value when the distribution is basically a "square". This approach generally rewards the more regular and reliable researchers, and it seems to be especially suitable for dealing with common situations such as applications for academic positions. To show the advantages of the [symbol in text]-index some mathematical properties are proved and an application to real data is proposed.

摘要

为了提高h指数在准确性和对引文分布形式的敏感性方面的表现,我们提出了新的文献计量指标[文中符号]。基本思路是,对于任何拥有给定引文数量的作者,定义一种“理想”的引文分布,该分布在论文数量和每篇出版物的引文数量方面代表一个基准,并获得一个指标,当实际引文分布接近其理想形式时,该指标的值会增加。该方法非常通用,因为理想分布可以根据指标的主要目标进行不同的定义。在本文中,我们建议通过“平方形式”分布来定义它:这与许多流行的文献计量指标一致,当分布基本为“方形”时,这些指标达到最大值。这种方法通常会奖励更规范、更可靠的研究人员,并且似乎特别适合处理诸如学术职位申请等常见情况。为了展示[文中符号]指标的优势,我们证明了一些数学性质,并提出了对实际数据的应用。

相似文献

1
A new bibliometric index based on the shape of the citation distribution.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115962. eCollection 2014.
2
A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200098. eCollection 2018.
3
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
4
Bibliometric indices: defining academic productivity and citation rates of researchers, departments and journals.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Feb;10(2):102-106. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013265. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
5
Bibliometrics of anaesthesia researchers in the UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):351-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer124. Epub 2011 May 26.
6
The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134794. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing academic productivity of U.S. otolaryngology departments using the (5) index.
SAGE Open Med. 2023 May 29;11:20503121231177765. doi: 10.1177/20503121231177765. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluating Journal Impact Factor: a systematic survey of the pros and cons, and overview of alternative measures.
J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 31;26:e20190082. doi: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2019-0082.
4
Bradford's law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Jul-Sep;14(3):842. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2014.03.842. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
5
Expectations and satisfaction of academic investigators in nonclinical collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;388(6):613-22. doi: 10.1007/s00210-015-1106-5. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The h'-index, effectively improving the h-index based on the citation distribution.
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059912. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
4
The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations.
PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005429. Epub 2009 May 5.
5
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. Epub 2005 Nov 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验