Chen Zhan-hong
Department of Stomatology, Fujian Provincial Hospital. Fuzhou 350001,Fujian Province, China.E-mail:
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2014 Oct;23(5):624-7.
To evaluate the clinical outcome of sonic endo-instruments in combination with Mtwo Ni-Ti files in root canal preparation of molars.
One hundred patients (118 first molars, 428 root canals) were included in this study, they were randomly assigned into 2 groups (n=50).Group 1 was shaped with sonic endo-instruments in combination with Mtwo Ni-Ti files,while group 2 was treated with stainless-steel files, both groups were obturated with lateral condensation technique. The time of root canal shaping, acute post-operative pain, the quality of the root canal filling and the success rate after 1 year were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 11.0 software package.
The average preparation time in group 1 was (5.3±0.6)min/canal and (12.7±0.9) min/canal in group 2 (t=100.89,P<0.001). The rate of acute postoperative pain was significantly lower X(2)=4.87, P<0.05,in group 1 (8.20%) than in group 2 (22.81%); in group 1, 92.86% root canals were filled adequately while only 78.92% in group 2, the difference was significant (X(2)=17.45, P<0.05);higher success rate (X(2)=3.95, P<0.05) after 1 year was achieved in group 1 (91.80%) compared with group 2 (78.95%).
Compared with stainless-steel files, sonic endo instruments in combination with Mtwo Ni-Ti files in root canal preparation of molars seem more effective, cause less postoperative pain and offer higher success rates.
评估声波根管治疗器械联合Mtwo镍钛锉在磨牙根管预备中的临床效果。
本研究纳入100例患者(118颗第一磨牙,428个根管),随机分为2组(每组n = 50)。第1组使用声波根管治疗器械联合Mtwo镍钛锉进行根管预备,第2组使用不锈钢锉进行治疗,两组均采用侧方加压技术进行根管充填。记录根管预备时间、术后急性疼痛情况、根管充填质量及1年后的成功率,并使用SPSS 11.0软件包进行分析。
第1组平均每根管预备时间为(5.3±0.6)分钟,第2组为(12.7±0.9)分钟(t = 100.89,P < 0.001)。第1组术后急性疼痛发生率(8.20%)显著低于第2组(22.81%)(X² = 4.87,P < 0.05);第1组92.86%的根管充填良好,而第2组仅为78.92%,差异有统计学意义(X² = 17.45,P < 0.05);1年后第1组成功率(91.80%)高于第2组(78.95%)(X² = 3.95,P < 0.05)。
与不锈钢锉相比,声波根管治疗器械联合Mtwo镍钛锉在磨牙根管预备中似乎更有效,术后疼痛更少,成功率更高。