Suppr超能文献

西班牙医院急诊科的用药清单评估

Medication list assessment in Spanish hospital emergency departments.

作者信息

Baena Parejo Maria Isabel, Juanes Borrego Ana Maria, Altimiras Ruiz Joan, Crespí Monjó Mar, García-Peláez Milagros, Calderón Hernanz Beatriz, Calleja Hernández Miguel Ángel, Chinchilla Fernández María Isabel, Prats Riera Margarita, García Sánchez Raquel, García Sánchez Laura, Vázquez López Cristina, Mauleon Echeverria Maria Dolores, Mas Serrano Patricio

机构信息

Provincial Delegate of the Ministry of Health, Cordoba, Spain.

Pharmacy Department, Hospital Santa Creu i sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.063. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication errors lead to morbidity and mortality among emergency department (ED) patients. An inaccurate medication history is one of the underlying causes of these errors.

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to determine the prevalence of patients with discrepancies between the medical list information contained in the clinical history compiled on admission to the ED and the list of medications patients are actually taking, to characterize the discrepancies found, and to analyze whether certain factors are associated with the risk of discrepancies.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational, multicenter study with an analytic component in the EDs of 11 hospitals in Spain. We compared pharmacist-obtained medication lists (PML) with ED-obtained medication lists (EDML). Discrepancy was defined as one or more differences (in drug or dosage or route of administration) between the EDML and PML. The endpoints were the proportion of patients with discrepancies in their home medical lists, and the prevalence of certain factors among patients with discrepancies and those without.

RESULTS

We detected 1476 discrepancies in 387 patients; no discrepancies were found in 20.7%. The most frequent discrepancies involved incomplete information (44.2%) and omission (41.8%). In the bivariate analysis, age, number of medications, and Charlson comorbidity score were significantly associated with discrepancy. In the multivariate analysis, number of medications and hospital were the variables associated with discrepancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The EDML differed from the list of medications patients were actually taking in 79.3% of cases. Incomplete information and omission were the most frequent discrepancies. Age, number of medications, and comorbidities were related to the risk of discrepancies.

摘要

背景

用药错误会导致急诊科患者发病和死亡。不准确的用药史是这些错误的潜在原因之一。

目的

本研究旨在确定急诊科(ED)入院时编制的临床病史中包含的用药清单信息与患者实际服用的药物清单之间存在差异的患者比例,描述所发现的差异特征,并分析某些因素是否与差异风险相关。

方法

我们在西班牙11家医院的急诊科进行了一项横断面、描述性、观察性、多中心研究,并带有分析部分。我们将药剂师获取的用药清单(PML)与急诊科获取的用药清单(EDML)进行了比较。差异被定义为EDML和PML之间存在一个或多个差异(在药物、剂量或给药途径方面)。终点指标是家庭用药清单存在差异的患者比例,以及有差异和无差异患者中某些因素的患病率。

结果

我们在387名患者中检测到1476处差异;20.7%的患者未发现差异。最常见的差异涉及信息不完整(44.2%)和遗漏(41.8%)。在双变量分析中,年龄、用药数量和查尔森合并症评分与差异显著相关。在多变量分析中,用药数量和医院是与差异相关的变量。

结论

在79.3%的病例中,EDML与患者实际服用的药物清单不同。信息不完整和遗漏是最常见的差异。年龄、用药数量和合并症与差异风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验