Dinesh T, Gaur Gs, Sharma Vk, Madanmohan T, Harichandra Kumar Kt, Bhavanani Ab
Department of Physiology, Vinayaka Mission's Medical College and Hospital, Karaikal, India.
Department of Physiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Int J Yoga. 2015 Jan;8(1):22-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-6131.146051.
Pranayamas are breathing techniques that exert profound physiological effects on pulmonary, cardiovascular, and mental functions. Previous studies demonstrate that different types of pranayamas produce divergent effects.
The aim was to compare the effect of 12 weeks of slow and fast pranayama training on pulmonary function in young, healthy volunteers.
This study was carried out in Departments of Physiology and ACYTER, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry in 2011.
Ninety one healthy volunteers were randomized into slow pranayama group (SPG), n =29, fast pranayama group (FPG), n = 32 and control groups (CG) (n = 30). Supervised pranayama training (SPG: Nadisodhana, Pranav pranayama and Savitri pranayama; FPG: Kapalabhati, Bhastrika and Kukkriya pranayama) was given for 30 min/day, thrice/week for 12 weeks by certified yoga instructors. Pulmonary function parameters (PFT) such as forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), ratio between FEV1 and FVC (FEV1 /FVC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV), and forced expiratory flow25-75 (FEF25-75), were recorded at baseline and after 12 weeks of pranayama training using the computerized spirometer (Micro laboratory V1.32, England).
In SPG, PEFR, and FEF25-75 improved significantly (P < 0.05) while other parameters (FVC, FEV1, FEV1 /FVC, and MVV) showed only marginal improvements. In FPG, FEV1 /FVC, PEFR, and FEF25-75 parameters improved significantly (P < 0.05), while FVC, FEV1, and MVV did not show significant (P > 0.05) change. No significant change was observed in CG.
Twelve weeks of pranayama training in young subjects showed improvement in the commonly measured PFT. This indicates that pranayama training improved pulmonary function and that this was more pronounced in the FPG.
调息法是对肺部、心血管和心理功能产生深远生理影响的呼吸技巧。先前的研究表明,不同类型的调息法会产生不同的效果。
目的是比较12周的慢调息法和快调息法训练对年轻健康志愿者肺功能的影响。
本研究于2011年在位于本地治里的贾瓦哈拉尔研究生医学教育与研究学院的生理学系和ACYTER进行。
91名健康志愿者被随机分为慢调息法组(SPG,n = 29)、快调息法组(FPG,n = 32)和对照组(CG,n = 30)。由认证瑜伽教练指导进行调息法训练(SPG:纳地净化法、调息法和萨维特里调息法;FPG:圣光调息法、风箱调息法和库克里亚调息法),每天30分钟,每周三次,共12周。使用计算机化肺活量计(英国Micro laboratory V1.32)在基线时和调息法训练12周后记录肺功能参数(PFT),如用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1与FVC之比(FEV1/FVC)、呼气峰值流速(PEFR)、最大自主通气量(MVV)和用力呼气流量25%-75%(FEF25-75)。
在SPG组中,PEFR和FEF25-75显著改善(P < 0.05),而其他参数(FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC和MVV)仅略有改善。在FPG组中,FEV1/FVC、PEFR和FEF25-75参数显著改善(P < 0.05),而FVC、FEV1和MVV未显示出显著变化(P > 0.05)。CG组未观察到显著变化。
对年轻受试者进行12周的调息法训练后,常用的PFT有所改善。这表明调息法训练改善了肺功能,且在FPG组中更为明显。