Kampen Helge, Medlock Jolyon M, Vaux Alexander G C, Koenraadt Constantianus J M, van Vliet Arnold J H, Bartumeus Frederic, Oltra Aitana, Sousa Carla A, Chouin Sébastien, Werner Doreen
Institute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Suedufer 10, 17493, Greifswald- Insel Riems, Germany.
Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jan 8;8:9. doi: 10.1186/s13071-014-0604-5.
The recent emergence in Europe of invasive mosquitoes and mosquito-borne disease associated with both invasive and native mosquito species has prompted intensified mosquito vector research in most European countries. Central to the efforts are mosquito monitoring and surveillance activities in order to assess the current species occurrence, distribution and, when possible, abundance, in order to permit the early detection of invasive species and the spread of competent vectors. As active mosquito collection, e.g. by trapping adults, dipping preimaginal developmental stages or ovitrapping, is usually cost-, time- and labour-intensive and can cover only small parts of a country, passive data collection approaches are gradually being integrated into monitoring programmes. Thus, scientists in several EU member states have recently initiated programmes for mosquito data collection and analysis that make use of sources other than targeted mosquito collection. While some of them extract mosquito distribution data from zoological databases established in other contexts, community-based approaches built upon the recognition, reporting, collection and submission of mosquito specimens by citizens are becoming more and more popular and increasingly support scientific research. Based on such reports and submissions, new populations, extended or new distribution areas and temporal activity patterns of invasive and native mosquito species were found. In all cases, extensive media work and communication with the participating individuals or groups was fundamental for success. The presented projects demonstrate that passive approaches are powerful tools to survey the mosquito fauna in order to supplement active mosquito surveillance strategies and render them more focused. Their ability to continuously produce biological data permits the early recognition of changes in the mosquito fauna that may have an impact on biting nuisance and the risk of pathogen transmission associated with mosquitoes. International coordination to explore synergies and increase efficiency of passive surveillance programmes across borders needs to be established.
近期在欧洲出现的与入侵性和本地蚊子物种相关的入侵性蚊子及蚊媒疾病,促使大多数欧洲国家加强了蚊虫媒介研究。这些努力的核心是蚊虫监测和监视活动,以评估当前物种的出现情况、分布,以及在可能的情况下评估其数量,以便能够早期发现入侵物种和有传播能力的媒介的扩散。由于主动采集蚊子,例如诱捕成虫、采集未成熟发育阶段的蚊子或诱蚊产卵器诱捕,通常成本高、耗时且费力,而且只能覆盖一个国家的小部分地区,因此被动数据收集方法正逐渐被纳入监测计划。因此,几个欧盟成员国的科学家最近启动了利用目标蚊子采集以外的来源进行蚊子数据收集和分析的项目。其中一些项目从在其他背景下建立的动物学数据库中提取蚊子分布数据,而基于公民对蚊子标本的识别、报告、收集和提交的社区方法越来越受欢迎,并越来越多地支持科学研究。基于此类报告和提交的数据,发现了入侵性和本地蚊子物种的新种群、扩展或新的分布区域以及时间活动模式。在所有情况下,广泛的媒体工作以及与参与的个人或团体的沟通对于成功至关重要。所介绍的项目表明,被动方法是调查蚊虫动物群的有力工具,可补充主动蚊虫监测策略并使其更具针对性。它们持续产生生物学数据的能力有助于早期识别可能影响叮咬滋扰以及与蚊子相关的病原体传播风险的蚊虫动物群变化。需要建立国际协调机制,以探索协同效应并提高跨境被动监测计划的效率。