Suppr超能文献

促甲状腺激素的参考范围。事后评估。

Reference range for thyrotropin. Post hoc assessment.

作者信息

Larisch Rolf, Giacobino A, Eckl W, Wahl H-G, Midgley J E M, Hoermann R

机构信息

Prof. Dr. Rolf Larisch, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Luedenscheid, Paulmannshoeher Str 14, 58515 Luedenscheid, Germany, E-mail:

出版信息

Nuklearmedizin. 2015;54(3):112-7. doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-0671-14-06. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Setting the reference range for thyrotropin (TSH) remains a matter of ongoing controversy.

PATIENTS, METHODS: We used an indirect method to determine the TSH reference range post hoc in a large sample. A total of 399 well characterised subjects showing no evidence of thyroid dysfunction were selected for definition of the TSH reference limits according to the method of Katayev et al.. To this end, the cumulative frequency was plotted against the individual logarithmic TSH values. Reference limits were calculated by extrapolating the middle linear part of the regression line to obtain the cut-offs for the 95% confidence interval. We also examined biological variation in a sample of 65 subjects with repeat measurements to establish reference change values (RCVs).

RESULTS

Based on these, the reference interval obtained by the novel technique was in close agreement with the conventionally established limits, but differed significantly from earlier recommendations.

DISCUSSION

Following unverified recommendations could result in a portion of patients with subclinical thyroid dysfunctions being missed, an important consideration in a setting with a high prevalence of thyroid autonomy.

CONCLUSION

Indirect post hoc verification of reference intervals from a large retrospective sample is a modern approach that gives plausible results. The method seems particularly useful to assess the adequacy and performance of reference limits reported or established by others in a particular setting. The present data should encourage re-evaluation of reference systems on a broader scale.

摘要

未标注

设定促甲状腺激素(TSH)的参考范围仍然是一个存在持续争议的问题。

患者、方法:我们采用间接方法事后确定了大样本中的TSH参考范围。根据Katayev等人的方法,共选择了399名特征明确且无甲状腺功能障碍证据的受试者来定义TSH参考限值。为此,将累积频率与个体对数TSH值进行绘图。通过外推回归线的中间线性部分来计算参考限值,以获得95%置信区间的临界值。我们还在65名受试者的样本中进行重复测量以检查生物学变异,从而确定参考变化值(RCV)。

结果

基于这些,新技术获得的参考区间与传统确定的限值密切一致,但与早期建议有显著差异。

讨论

遵循未经证实的建议可能会导致遗漏一部分亚临床甲状腺功能障碍患者,在甲状腺自主性患病率较高的情况下,这是一个重要的考虑因素。

结论

从大型回顾性样本中间接事后验证参考区间是一种能得出合理结果的现代方法。该方法似乎特别有助于评估他人在特定环境中报告或确定的参考限值的充分性和性能。目前的数据应促使在更广泛的范围内重新评估参考系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验