Kuzilek Jakub, Kremen Vaclav, Lhotska Lenka
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:3857-60. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944465.
This paper explores differences between two methods for blind source separation within frame of ECG de-noising. First method is joint approximate diagonalization of eigenmatrices, which is based on estimation of fourth order cross-cummulant tensor and its diagonalization. Second one is the statistical method known as canonical correlation analysis, which is based on estimation of correlation matrices between two multidimensional variables. Both methods were used within method, which combines the blind source separation algorithm with decision tree. The evaluation was made on large database of 382 long-term ECG signals and the results were examined. Biggest difference was found in results of 50 Hz power line interference where the CCA algorithm completely failed. Thus main power of CCA lies in estimation of unstructured noise within ECG. JADE algorithm has larger computational complexity thus the CCA perfomed faster when estimating the components.
本文探讨了心电图去噪框架内两种盲源分离方法之间的差异。第一种方法是特征矩阵联合近似对角化,它基于四阶互累积量张量的估计及其对角化。第二种方法是称为典型相关分析的统计方法,它基于两个多维变量之间相关矩阵的估计。这两种方法都用于将盲源分离算法与决策树相结合的方法中。对包含382个长期心电图信号的大型数据库进行了评估,并对结果进行了检验。在50Hz电力线干扰的结果中发现了最大的差异,其中典型相关分析算法完全失败。因此,典型相关分析的主要优势在于估计心电图中的非结构化噪声。联合近似对角化特征矩阵算法具有更大的计算复杂度,因此在估计分量时典型相关分析算法执行速度更快。