Suppr超能文献

对妇产科住院医师培训项目中住院医师夜间值班轮班系统的认知

Perceptions of a night float system of resident call within an obstetrics and gynaecology residency training program.

作者信息

Shirreff Lindsay, Shapiro Jodi L, Yudin Mark H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto ON.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Nov;36(11):957-961. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30407-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the attitudes of residents, attending obstetricians, and nursing staff members towards night float resident call, compared with a traditional 24-hour call system.

METHODS

In June 2012, obstetrics and gynaecology residents at the University of Toronto who had participated in both a night float and a 24-hour call system were asked to complete an electronic survey. Attending obstetricians and nurses in the labour and delivery unit at two tertiary care hospitals with a night float system of resident call completed electronic and paper surveys, respectively. Questions asked respondents to compare the two systems of call with respect to resident morale, fatigue, and continuity of care, and to indicate which system of call they preferred.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 20/24 residents (83%), 24/39 attending obstetricians (62%) and 47/58 nurses (81%). Most residents reported less fatigue (17/20, 85%) and improved continuity of care (15/20, 75%) while doing night float call, but morale was mixed. Overall, 14/20 (70%) residents preferred the night float system. Staff perceptions of resident night float call were mixed in all areas, and most reported no difference in resident morale (17/24, 71%). Nurses found residents were less fatigued (32/47, 68%) and easier to work with (34/47, 72%), and felt that night float call improved continuity of care (37/47, 79%).

CONCLUSION

Resident attitudes towards night float call are mostly positive. Attitudes of attending obstetricians are mixed, but nurses prefer this system of resident call.

摘要

目的

与传统的24小时值班制度相比,确定住院医师、产科主治医师和护理人员对住院医师夜间轮值呼叫的态度。

方法

2012年6月,邀请多伦多大学参与过夜间轮值和24小时值班制度的妇产科住院医师完成一项电子调查。在两家采用住院医师夜间轮值呼叫制度的三级护理医院的产科病房,主治医师和护士分别完成了电子和纸质调查。问题要求受访者比较这两种值班制度在住院医师士气、疲劳程度和护理连续性方面的情况,并指出他们更喜欢哪种值班制度。

结果

24名住院医师中的20名(83%)、39名产科主治医师中的24名(62%)和58名护士中的4名(81%)完成了调查。大多数住院医师表示,在进行夜间轮值呼叫时疲劳程度较低(17/20,85%),护理连续性有所改善(15/20,75%),但士气有好有坏。总体而言,20名住院医师中有14名(70%)更喜欢夜间轮值制度。工作人员对住院医师夜间轮值呼叫的看法在各个方面都有好有坏,大多数人表示住院医师的士气没有差异(17/24,71%)。护士们发现住院医师疲劳程度较低(32/47,68%),更容易共事(34/47,72%),并认为夜间轮值呼叫改善了护理连续性(37/47,79%)。

结论

住院医师对夜间轮值呼叫的态度大多是积极的。产科主治医师的态度有好有坏,但护士更喜欢这种住院医师值班制度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验