Aasheim E T, Aylwin S J B, Radhakrishnan S T, Sood A S, Jovanovic A, Olbers T, le Roux C W
Imperial Weight Centre, Imperial College London, London, UKDepartment of Endocrinology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Clin Obes. 2011 Apr;1(2-3):77-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00017.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
• Weight or weight loss per se may not indicate health status or health benefit. • There is no gold standard for assessing which patients would benefit most from weight-loss interventions. • The King's Criteria is one of several recently proposed obesity classification systems.
• The King's Criteria can capture health problems related to obesity and health benefits after weight loss. • The King's Criteria is a reproducible scoring system. • Using the King's Criteria may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians from weight loss to health gain.
Body mass index (BMI) alone does not reflect health status in individuals. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria is a clinical tool for the assessment of patients with complex obesity. We assessed the performance of a modified version of the King's Criteria by scoring 144 obese patients before and 1 year after bariatric surgery. We also evaluated inter-observer variability by having 11 clinicians score the same 12 patients. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria comprise nine health domains: Airways, Body mass index, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Economic complications, Functional limitations, Gonadal axis, Health status (perceived), and body Image. For each domain, a person's health is assigned a score of 0 ('normal health'), 1 ('at risk'), 2 ('established disease') or 3 ('advanced disease'). The patient's mean BMI decreased from 48 ± 7 to 37 ± 7 kg m(-2) post surgery. Before surgery, 84% of patients were either in stage 2 ('established disease') or stage 3 ('advanced disease') for one or more domains other than BMI. The modified King's Criteria showed significant health improvements after surgery, with a higher proportion of patients scored in stage 0 ('normal health') within each health domain (P < 0.001 for all). Observers assigned the same score in >75% of cases for all domains except Health status perceived (71%) and body Image (65%). In conclusion the King's Criteria captured morbidity in obese patients and health gains after weight loss. Different clinicians mostly assigned similar scores. The King's Criteria is a clinical tool that may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians towards improving health and not only losing weight.
NCT01112228 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
• 体重或体重减轻本身可能无法表明健康状况或健康益处。• 对于评估哪些患者将从减肥干预中获益最多,尚无金标准。• 国王标准是最近提出的几种肥胖分类系统之一。
• 国王标准可以体现与肥胖相关的健康问题以及减肥后的健康益处。• 国王标准是一种可重复的评分系统。• 使用国王标准可能有助于将患者和临床医生的关注点从减肥转向健康获益。
仅身体质量指数(BMI)并不能反映个体的健康状况。国王肥胖分期标准是一种用于评估复杂肥胖患者的临床工具。我们通过对144例肥胖患者在减肥手术前及术后1年进行评分,评估了改良版国王标准的性能。我们还让11名临床医生对相同的12例患者进行评分,以评估观察者间的变异性。国王肥胖分期标准包括九个健康领域:气道、身体质量指数、心血管疾病、糖尿病、经济并发症、功能受限、性腺轴、健康状况(感知)和身体形象。对于每个领域,根据一个人的健康状况给予0分(“健康正常”)、1分(“有风险”)、2分(“确诊疾病”)或3分(“晚期疾病”)。患者术后平均BMI从48±7降至37±7 kg m⁻²。手术前,84%的患者在除BMI之外的一个或多个领域处于2期(“确诊疾病”)或3期(“晚期疾病”)。改良后的国王标准显示术后健康状况有显著改善,每个健康领域中处于0期(“健康正常”)的患者比例更高(所有P<0.001)。除了健康状况感知(71%)和身体形象(65%)外,观察者在所有领域超过75%的病例中给出了相同的评分。总之,国王标准体现了肥胖患者的发病率以及减肥后的健康获益。不同临床医生给出的评分大多相似。国王标准是一种临床工具,可能有助于将患者和临床医生的关注点转向改善健康,而不仅仅是减肥。
NCT01112228(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)