Diggans James, Kim Su Yeon, Hu Zhanzhi, Pankratz Daniel, Wong Mei, Reynolds Jessica, Tom Ed, Pagan Moraima, Monroe Robert, Rosai Juan, Livolsi Virginia A, Lanman Richard B, Kloos Richard T, Walsh P Sean, Kennedy Giulia C
Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2015:371-82.
The promise of personalized medicine will require rigorously validated molecular diagnostics developed on minimally invasive, clinically relevant samples. Measurement of DNA mutations is increasingly common in clinical settings but only higher-prevalence mutations are cost-effective. Patients with rare variants are at best ignored or, at worst, misdiagnosed. Mutations result in downstream impacts on transcription, offering the possibility of broader diagnosis for patients with rare variants causing similar downstream changes. Use of such signatures in clinical settings is rare as these algorithms are difficult to validate for commercial use. Validation on a test set (against a clinical gold standard) is necessary but not sufficient: accuracy must be maintained amidst interfering substances, across reagent lots and across operators. Here we report the development, clinical validation, and diagnostic accuracy of a pre-operative molecular test (Afirma BRAF) to identify BRAF V600E mutations using mRNA expression in thyroid fine needle aspirate biopsies (FNABs). FNABs were obtained prospectively from 716 nodules and more than 3,000 features measured using microarrays. BRAF V600E labels for training (n=181) and independent test (n=535) sets were established using a sensitive quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. The resulting 128-gene linear support vector machine was compared to qPCR in the independent test set. Clinical sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were evaluated in a subset of test set samples (n=213) with expert-derived histopathology. We observed high positive- (PPA, 90.4%) and negative (NPA, 99.0%) percent agreement with qPCR on the test set. Clinical sensitivity for malignancy was 43.8% (consistent with published prevalence of BRAF V600E in this neoplasm) and specificity was 100%, identical to qPCR on the same samples. Classification was accurate in up to 60% blood. A double-mutant still resulting in the V600E amino acid change was negative by qPCR but correctly positive by Afirma BRAF. Non-diagnostic rates were lower (7.6%) for Afirma BRAF than for qPCR (24.5%), a further advantage of using RNA in small sample biopsies. Afirma BRAF accurately determined the presence or absence of the BRAF V600E DNA mutation in FNABs, a collection method directly relevant to solid tumor assessment, with performance equal to that of an established, highly sensitive DNA-based assay and with a lower non-diagnostic rate. This is the first such test in thyroid cancer to undergo sufficient analytical and clinical validation for real-world use in a personalized medicine context to frame individual patient risk and inform surgical choice.
个性化医疗的前景需要基于微创、临床相关样本开发的经过严格验证的分子诊断方法。DNA突变检测在临床环境中越来越普遍,但只有高流行率的突变才具有成本效益。携带罕见变异的患者要么被忽视,要么被误诊。突变会对转录产生下游影响,这为诊断携带导致相似下游变化的罕见变异的患者提供了更广泛的可能性。由于这些算法难以验证用于商业用途,因此在临床环境中很少使用此类特征。在测试集(与临床金标准对照)上进行验证是必要的,但并不充分:在存在干扰物质的情况下、不同试剂批次之间以及不同操作人员之间,都必须保持准确性。在此,我们报告了一种术前分子检测方法(Afirma BRAF)的开发、临床验证和诊断准确性,该方法利用甲状腺细针穿刺活检(FNAB)中的mRNA表达来识别BRAF V600E突变。前瞻性地从716个结节中获取FNAB,并使用微阵列测量3000多个特征。使用灵敏的定量PCR(qPCR)检测法为训练集(n = 181)和独立测试集(n = 535)建立BRAF V600E标签。在独立测试集中,将所得的128基因线性支持向量机与qPCR进行比较。在测试集样本的一个子集(n = 213)中,采用专家得出的组织病理学评估对恶性肿瘤的临床敏感性和特异性。我们在测试集上观察到与qPCR的高阳性(PPA,90.4%)和阴性(NPA,99.0%)一致性。恶性肿瘤的临床敏感性为43.8%(与该肿瘤中BRAF V600E的已发表流行率一致),特异性为100%,与相同样本上的qPCR相同。在高达60%的血液中分类准确。一个仍导致V600E氨基酸变化的双突变体通过qPCR检测为阴性,但通过Afirma BRAF检测正确为阳性。Afirma BRAF的非诊断率(7.6%)低于qPCR(24.5%),这是在小样本活检中使用RNA的另一个优势。Afirma BRAF准确地确定了FNAB中BRAF V600E DNA突变的存在与否,FNAB是一种与实体瘤评估直接相关的采集方法,其性能与已建立的、高度灵敏的基于DNA的检测方法相当,且非诊断率较低。这是甲状腺癌中首个在个性化医疗背景下进行了充分的分析和临床验证以供实际应用的此类检测,用于确定个体患者风险并为手术选择提供依据。