Schiff G D, Amato M G, Eguale T, Boehne J J, Wright A, Koppel R, Rashidee A H, Elson R B, Whitney D L, Thach T-T, Bates D W, Seger A C
Brigham and Women's Hospital Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):264-71. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003555. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
Medication computerised provider order entry (CPOE) has been shown to decrease errors and is being widely adopted. However, CPOE also has potential for introducing or contributing to errors.
The objectives of this study are to (a) analyse medication error reports where CPOE was reported as a 'contributing cause' and (b) develop 'use cases' based on these reports to test vulnerability of current CPOE systems to these errors.
A review of medication errors reported to United States Pharmacopeia MEDMARX reporting system was made, and a taxonomy was developed for CPOE-related errors. For each error we evaluated what went wrong and why and identified potential prevention strategies and recurring error scenarios. These scenarios were then used to test vulnerability of leading CPOE systems, asking typical users to enter these erroneous orders to assess the degree to which these problematic orders could be entered.
Between 2003 and 2010, 1.04 million medication errors were reported to MEDMARX, of which 63 040 were reported as CPOE related. A review of 10 060 CPOE-related cases was used to derive 101 codes describing what went wrong, 67 codes describing reasons why errors occurred, 73 codes describing potential prevention strategies and 21 codes describing recurring error scenarios. Ability to enter these erroneous order scenarios was tested on 13 CPOE systems at 16 sites. Overall, 298 (79.5%) of the erroneous orders were able to be entered including 100 (28.0%) being 'easily' placed, another 101 (28.3%) with only minor workarounds and no warnings.
Medication error reports provide valuable information for understanding CPOE-related errors. Reports were useful for developing taxonomy and identifying recurring errors to which current CPOE systems are vulnerable. Enhanced monitoring, reporting and testing of CPOE systems are important to improve CPOE safety.
药物计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)已被证明可减少错误,且正在被广泛采用。然而,CPOE也有可能引入错误或导致错误。
本研究的目的是(a)分析将CPOE报告为“促成原因”的用药错误报告,以及(b)根据这些报告开发“用例”,以测试当前CPOE系统对这些错误的易感性。
对向美国药典MEDMARX报告系统报告的用药错误进行了回顾,并为与CPOE相关的错误制定了分类法。对于每个错误,我们评估了出错的情况和原因,并确定了潜在的预防策略和反复出现的错误场景。然后使用这些场景来测试领先CPOE系统的易感性,要求典型用户输入这些错误医嘱,以评估这些有问题的医嘱能够被输入的程度。
2003年至2010年期间,向MEDMARX报告了104万起用药错误,其中63040起被报告为与CPOE相关。对10060例与CPOE相关的病例进行回顾,得出101个描述出错情况的代码、67个描述错误发生原因的代码、73个描述潜在预防策略的代码和21个描述反复出现的错误场景的代码。在16个地点的13个CPOE系统上测试了输入这些错误医嘱场景的能力。总体而言,298个(79.5%)错误医嘱能够被输入,其中100个(28.0%)“轻松”录入,另外101个(28.3%)只需少量变通方法且无警告。
用药错误报告为理解与CPOE相关的错误提供了有价值的信息。这些报告对于制定分类法和识别当前CPOE系统易受影响的反复出现的错误很有用。加强对CPOE系统的监测、报告和测试对于提高CPOE安全性很重要。