Bogaerts Katleen, Rayen Liselotte, Lavrysen Ann, Van Diest Ilse, Janssens Thomas, Schruers Koen, Van den Bergh Omer
Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 20;10(1):e0115748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115748. eCollection 2015.
In two studies, we aimed at further elucidating the relationship between trait negative affectivity (NA) and habitual symptom reporting (HSR) by relating these variables to measures of executive function, trait questionnaires, and effects of emotion induction.
Healthy female participants (N = 75) were selected on their scores for trait NA and for the Checklist for Symptoms in Daily Life. Three groups were compared: (1) low NA-low HSR; (2) high NA-low HSR; and (3) high NA-high HSR (low NA-high HSR did not occur). In study 1, participants underwent a Parametric Go/No-go Task and a Stroop Color-Word test, and trait questionnaires measured alexithymia and absorption. Forty-five participants (N = 15 in each group) were further engaged in study 2 to induce state NA using an affective picture paradigm.
Impaired inhibition on the Stroop and Go/No go Task characterized high trait NA, but not high HSR, whereas alexithymia and absorption were elevated in HSR, regardless of trait NA. Negative picture viewing induced elevated state NA in all groups, but only high HSR also reported more bodily symptoms. This effect was moderated, but not mediated by state NA.
High trait NA is a vulnerability factor but not a sufficient condition to develop HSR. Deficient inhibition is related to the broad trait of NA, whereas the moderating effect of state NA on symptom reporting is specific for high HSR. Understanding processes related to alexithymia and absorption may specifically help to explain elevated HSR.
在两项研究中,我们旨在通过将特质消极情感性(NA)和习惯性症状报告(HSR)与执行功能测量、特质问卷以及情绪诱导效应相关联,进一步阐明它们之间的关系。
根据特质NA得分和日常生活症状清单得分,选取健康女性参与者(N = 75)。比较了三组:(1)低NA - 低HSR;(2)高NA - 低HSR;(3)高NA - 高HSR(未出现低NA - 高HSR情况)。在研究1中,参与者进行了参数化的Go/No-go任务和Stroop颜色 - 文字测试,特质问卷测量了述情障碍和专注度。45名参与者(每组N = 15)进一步参与研究2,使用情感图片范式诱导状态NA。
在Stroop任务和Go/No-go任务中抑制能力受损是高特质NA的特征,但不是高HSR的特征,而无论特质NA如何,述情障碍和专注度在HSR中均升高。观看负面图片会使所有组的状态NA升高,但只有高HSR也报告了更多身体症状。这种效应受到调节,但不是由状态NA介导的。
高特质NA是一个易患因素,但不是发展为HSR的充分条件。抑制能力不足与NA的广泛特质相关,而状态NA对症状报告的调节作用是高HSR所特有的。理解与述情障碍和专注度相关的过程可能特别有助于解释HSR升高的原因。