Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗单药治疗或联合改善病情抗风湿药物治疗对类风湿关节炎患者且对既往治疗反应不佳的疗效比较:一项接近临床实践的开放标签研究

Comparison of tocilizumab as monotherapy or with add-on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to previous treatments: an open-label study close to clinical practice.

作者信息

Bykerk Vivian P, Östör Andrew J K, Alvaro-Gracia José, Pavelka Karel, Román Ivorra José Andrés, Graninger Winfried, Bensen William, Nurmohamed Michael T, Krause Andreas, Bernasconi Corrado, Aassi Maher, Sibilia Jean

机构信息

Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA,

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;34(3):563-71. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2857-y. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Abstract

This was an exploratory analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab monotherapy with those of tocilizumab in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Data were from a single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, 24-week study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in which patients with inadequate responses to DMARDs or tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks plus methotrexate/other DMARD(s) combination therapy. If they were intolerant of methotrexate/other DMARD, patients received tocilizumab monotherapy. Effectiveness endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses (ACR20/50/70/90) and disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28). Of 1,681 patients, 239 received tocilizumab monotherapy, and 1,442 received combination therapy. Methotrexate was the most common DMARD (79%) used in combination therapy. The frequency of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to withdrawal were similar between tocilizumab monotherapy (82.4, 7.9, and 5.4%, respectively) and combination therapy (76.6, 7.8, and 5.1%, respectively). No differences in ACR20/50/70/90 responses were observed between treatment groups (66.9%/43.5%/23.8%/10.0% vs 66.9%/47.2%/26.8%/8.5%, respectively; p > 0.12 for all individual comparisons, including ACR50 propensity score analyses). The decrease in DAS28 was also similar between treatment groups (mean ± standard deviation: -3.41 ± 1.49 for tocilizumab monotherapy vs -3.43 ± 1.43 for combination therapy; p > 0.33 all analyses, including propensity score analyses). Tocilizumab had a comparable safety profile, and was similarly effective, when used as monotherapy or in combination with DMARDs in a broad population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

摘要

这是一项探索性分析,比较了托珠单抗单药治疗与托珠单抗联合改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)的安全性和有效性。数据来自一项针对类风湿关节炎患者的单臂、非随机、开放标签的24周研究,在该研究中,对DMARDs或肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂反应不足的患者每4周静脉注射8mg/kg托珠单抗加甲氨蝶呤/其他DMARD联合治疗。如果患者对甲氨蝶呤/其他DMARD不耐受,则接受托珠单抗单药治疗。有效性终点包括美国风湿病学会(ACR)反应(ACR20/50/70/90)和28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)。在1681例患者中,239例接受托珠单抗单药治疗,1442例接受联合治疗。甲氨蝶呤是联合治疗中最常用的DMARD(79%)。托珠单抗单药治疗组(分别为82.4%、7.9%和5.4%)和联合治疗组(分别为76.6%、7.8%和5.1%)的不良事件(AE)发生率、严重AE发生率和导致停药的AE发生率相似。治疗组之间在ACR20/50/70/90反应方面未观察到差异(分别为66.9%/43.5%/23.8%/10.0%对66.9%/47.2%/26.8%/8.5%;所有个体比较,包括ACR50倾向得分分析,p>0.12)。治疗组之间DAS28的降低也相似(平均值±标准差:托珠单抗单药治疗为-3.41±1.49,联合治疗为-3.43±1.43;所有分析,包括倾向得分分析,p>0.33)。在广泛的类风湿关节炎患者群体中,托珠单抗作为单药治疗或与DMARD联合使用时,具有相当的安全性,且疗效相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c78/4348534/296a0b2d8ca5/10067_2014_2857_Fig1a_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验