Chaikriangkrai Kongkiat, Velankar Pradnya, Schutt Robert, Alchalabi Sama, Nabi Faisal, Mahmarian John, Chang Su Min
Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):738-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.032. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
The objective of this study was to examine the additive prognostic performance of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) over coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) stenosis assessment in symptomatic patients suspected for coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CCTA. A total of 805 symptomatic patients without known history of CAD who underwent coronary evaluation by multidetector cardiac CT were analyzed. Mean age of the cohort was 58 ± 13 years. A total of 44% (354 of 805) of the patients had a 0 CACS, 27% (215 of 805) had CACS 1 to 100, 14% (111 of 805) had CACS 101 to 400, and 15% (125 of 805) had CACS >400. CCTA showed normal coronary arteries in 43% (349 of 805) of patients, ≤50% stenosis in 42% (333 of 805), and >50% stenosis in 15% (123 of 805). Patients were followed for 2.3 ± 0.9 years. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and late coronary revascularization. Overall incidence of MACE was 1.4% per year. Both CACS and CCTA stenosis were independently associated with increased MACE (p <0.05 for both). Addition of CACS into the model with clinical risk factors and CCTA stenosis significantly improved predictive performance for MACE from the model with clinical risk factors and CCTA stenosis only (global chi-square score 108 vs 70; p = 0.019). In conclusion; in symptomatic patients without known CAD, both CACS and CCTA stenosis were independently associated with increased cardiac events, and performing non-contrast-enhanced CACS evaluation in addition to contrast-enhanced CCTA improved predictive ability for future cardiac events compared to CCTA stenosis assessment alone.
本研究的目的是,在因怀疑患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)而接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)的有症状患者中,检验冠状动脉钙化积分(CACS)相对于CCTA狭窄评估的附加预后性能。分析了总共805例无CAD已知病史且接受了多排心脏CT冠状动脉评估的有症状患者。该队列的平均年龄为58±13岁。总共44%(805例中的354例)患者的CACS为0,27%(805例中的215例)患者的CACS为1至100,14%(805例中的111例)患者的CACS为101至400,15%(805例中的125例)患者的CACS>400。CCTA显示43%(805例中的349例)患者的冠状动脉正常,42%(805例中的333例)患者的狭窄≤50%,15%(805例中的123例)患者的狭窄>50%。对患者进行了2.3±0.9年的随访。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)定义为心源性死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和晚期冠状动脉血运重建。MACE的总体发生率为每年1.4%。CACS和CCTA狭窄均与MACE增加独立相关(两者p<0.05)。将CACS添加到包含临床危险因素和CCTA狭窄的模型中,相对于仅包含临床危险因素和CCTA狭窄的模型,显著提高了对MACE的预测性能(全局卡方评分108对70;p = 0.019)。总之,在无已知CAD的有症状患者中,CACS和CCTA狭窄均与心脏事件增加独立相关,与单独的CCTA狭窄评估相比,除了增强对比的CCTA之外,进行非增强CACS评估可提高对未来心脏事件的预测能力。